Berachain: How many times did you admit your mistakes before you really planned to change them? Since February, I have posted four or five articles questioning Berachain, and the project team has responded without saying anything, and after asking repeatedly, I have learned to play dead. What's even more interesting is that every time he comes out to "confess", it is always the co-founder Smokey, who "regretted" selling too many tokens to VC in a media interview last time, and this time he admitted in the comment section that he didn't drop BERA to Boyco in the genesis stage. A few months have passed, and Berachain has admitted its mistakes again and again, but it just can't learn how to change it? This only shows that they knew these problems from the beginning, and they didn't hear the feedback from the community, or they didn't know what the problem was. It's just that, from beginning to end, I didn't think about changing it. The community wants to know what you're going to do, and if all that's waiting is one sentence: we were wrong. This is not a problem at all, this is nothing more than a performance of remorse. The confession of refusal to act is a complete betrayal of the trust of the community!
《如何拆穿Berachain PUA式发言,原理和逻辑》 社区对Berachain的批评,项目方似乎听到了,但从回应上似乎又没有完全听到。 市场上的很多项目方充斥着这种“事后合理化”的无效反思,乍一看似乎很诚恳,但却没有任何实质性内容。如果所有的反思都体现在“如果能重来”的表态上,那么这就不是反思,这只是一次市场公关行为。 道理很简单。 1、在一开始的时候,在设计代币经济学的时候,就应该考量社区分发、VC分发的公平性。目前的所谓反思,只能说明在一开始,他们就非常认可代币卖给VC的合理性,而不是所谓的长期建设。 一句轻飘飘的“如果能重来”,跟渣男/家暴男忏悔没有任何本质区别。 因为这里面隐藏着非常巧妙的话术逻辑,因为一旦你相信“如果能重来”这个前提假设,那么他的错误就变得无关紧要。这在心理学上有个专有名词,叫:反事实思维(弱化责任)和认知解离(让错误看起来不重要)。 所有不打算承认错误的人,都非常习惯性用假设性反思来掩盖真正的错误并博取同情。正确的承认错误应该是你当时为什么这么做,以及直接坦诚的承认这是急功近利下的错误决策。 2、回购作为弥补措施非常不具有说服力和有效性。我就试问,回购的资金哪里来,你的资金是不是也还是来自社区/用户的贡献,难不成你是想增发代币???......。如果你说不清楚这个,那无非是偷梁换柱的用社区贡献继续给VC套现买单。 这在心理学上专有名词叫:象征性补偿。换句话的意思就是:为了掩盖错误,我象征性补偿,但这不!是!真!正!等!价!的! 所有不打算改正错误的人,都非常习惯用避重就轻的方法去掩盖错误并试图和稀泥。如果你真的在改正错误,你不应该说你努力在回购,而是你应该详细公布过去一段时间做了具体的哪些行动去挽回社区的声誉。 @berachain
Show original
77.64K
105
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.