
Post
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
今晚20:30,美国8月CPI公布。
所有人都在赌两个方向:超预期=利空,低于预期=利多。
但没人认真讨论第三种可能——恰好符合预期。
而这,恰恰是概率最大的那个情景。
先说为什么“符合预期”是最可能的。
路透统计的预测中值:8月整体CPI环比涨0.4%,核心CPI环比涨0.2%。
但Natixis首席美国经济学家霍奇的测算更精确——核心CPI环比0.19%。他直接说了:在当前美联储内部对利率路径分歧严重的背景下,低于0.20%的读数才可能避免9月加息。
0.19%和0.2%,看起来一样。但在美联储眼里,差了一个世界。
花旗预测0.184%,美银预测0.22%。一个说按兵不动,一个说加息落地。0.04个百分点的差距,就是两种命运。
而0.19%,恰好卡在中间。
现在推演“中间情景”下,市场会怎么走。
第一层:即时反应——反弹,但别高兴太早。
数据出来“符合预期”,没有新的利空砸下来。比特币从78,000附近小弹一下,空头部分平仓。但0.19%离0.20%太近了,近到市场不敢把它当成“通胀在降温”的信号。
这就是“符合预期”最坑的地方——它给了你喘息,但不给你方向。
第二层:深层逻辑——沃什大概率还是加息。
沃什在杰克逊霍尔已经说得很清楚了:通胀下降速度不够,“还有工作要做”。他关注的是超核心PCE,目前已经升到3.9%且还在上行。
更关键的是,从公开表态来看,沃什手里已经有一个“足以组成多数赞成加息的潜在联盟”——至少8张政策逻辑上可以支持加息的票。
0.19%的核心CPI,不够好到让沃什放弃加息,也不够坏到逼他必须加息。
它只是把决定权完全交到了沃什手里。
第三层:机构行为——FOMC前没人敢重仓。
下周二到周三就是FOMC会议。今晚CPI只是开胃菜。
即便数据“符合预期”,机构也不会因为这个就大举加仓。不确定性还在,资金会继续观望。交易员已经削减了比特币杠杆多头曝险,永续合约未平仓量下滑,资金费率压缩到接近中性。
市场已经“把风险移出桌面,但没有翻空”。
这意味着什么?意味着如果数据符合预期,市场有反弹空间;但如果沃什下周还是加息,反弹就是给你跑的机会。
跟上一次CPI对比:7月CPI环比只涨0.1%,当时市场反应是什么?
比特币从64,400美元回落至64,080美元,然后继续在64,000附近震荡。
波澜不惊。因为“符合预期”本身就是最无聊的剧本。
但无聊的剧本,往往是最安全的剧本。
交易启示:别赌方向,做区间。
过去20个交易日,比特币一直在77,100到81,300美元区间横盘。今晚CPI + 下周FOMC,两件事叠加,最可能的走势就是——继续震。
77,000-78,000是近期支撑区,81,000-82,000是阻力区。在中间情景下,区间高抛低吸比赌方向合理得多。
CPI符合预期,不是利好的开始,只是利空的暂停。
别把“没有坏消息”当成“好消息”。
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #PPI高于预期,今晚CPI定方向
Latest data from CME "Fed Watch": 71.3% probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in September. The October rate hike is already fully priced in. The probability of another hike in December is also close to 60%.
In other words, the market has treated the "September rate hike" as a done deal.
But here’s the problem—
Most economists still expect the Fed to keep rates unchanged in September.
There’s a river separating market pricing and institutional expectations. Bank of America is Wall Street’s most hawkish investment bank, predicting three consecutive hikes—in September, October, and December.
But the futures market is already betting on a "definite hike in September." One side has to be wrong.
A former senior Fed economist said something very piercing.
Vincent Reinhart, Chief Economist at BNY Mellon Investment Management, said:
"This is basically a provocation, like a challenge on the playground."
He said the market has priced in a rate hike that Waller never promised. Waller now faces a dilemma: either deliver the hike or explain why not.
To translate: the market is forcing Waller to take a stand.
Like a group on the playground surrounding you saying, "Didn't you say you’d fight? Then fight."
What did Waller say at Jackson Hole? He said the inflation target is "firm and fixed," that financial conditions are "not clearly restrictive," and that if core inflation doesn’t clearly fall, "we still have work to do."
Every sentence sounds hawkish. But he never said, "I will hike in September."
The market took his words as "hike immediately." But Reinhart believes Waller’s hawkish speech was essentially to reassure investors doubting his commitment to fighting inflation—he needs to convince the market he’s not dovish, but he doesn’t actually want to hike.
Steven Blitz from TS Lombard put it more bluntly: "Unless the data forces him into a corner where hiking is the only option, he will find reasons not to hike."
So what data would "force" him?
Tonight at 8:30 PM, August CPI.
Economists expect: overall month-on-month +0.4%, core month-on-month +0.2%.
The key is the core reading. Fed Governor Waller has already said: if core month-on-month is 0.2%, he will vote to keep rates steady; if the data overheats, he will support a hike.
The difference between 0.2% and 0.3% could be the lifeline or death line for global risk assets.
PPI already exploded first—August year-on-year 5.4%, above expectations, diesel surged 24.1% in one month, energy prices accelerated again. After the data release, the probability of a September hike jumped from 62% to over 70%, 2-year Treasury yield rose to 4.51%, 30-year yield surpassed 5.35%, and both WTI and Brent crude broke $100.
But the transmission from PPI to CPI has a lag, and their measurement and weighting structures differ. PPI exploding doesn’t necessarily mean CPI will explode.
My judgment: if tonight’s core CPI ≤ 0.2%, Waller will most likely choose to "hold steady."
Then use hawkish language to maintain market expectations—"inflation risks remain tilted to the upside," "we still have work to do," "financial conditions are not tight enough."
This is not dovish. This is "delay."
Waller did something very smart at Jackson Hole: he gave no forward guidance, no commitment to any specific path, yet successfully let the market conclude "a hike is coming."
The market managed the tightening expectations for him. He just needs to keep silent to maintain deterrence.
But if core CPI ≥ 0.3%, that’s a different story. The data will corner Waller, and he can only hike. If he doesn’t, his carefully built "anti-inflation" persona since taking office will collapse overnight.
For crypto, this is an extremely conflicted position.
BTC is hovering between $76,000 and $77,000, down about 1.9% in 24 hours. PPI above expectations + oil prices breaking $100 + soaring rate hike expectations—triple pressure.
But note one detail: the daily ADX is as high as 54.4, mid-term trend momentum remains strong, and the current decline has not broken the daily uptrend structure.
In other words—short-term getting hit, but not dead yet.
If tonight’s core CPI reading ≤ 0.2%, BTC has room to rebound; if ≥ 0.3%, $76,000 may not hold, next stop could be $74,000 or even lower.
So, don’t just focus on the binary question of "hike or not."
Waller’s predicament is: the market has already priced in the hike, and whether he hikes or not, he pays a price.
Hiking proves the market "guessed right," and in the future, the market will be even more brazen in making decisions for him.
Not hiking means he needs to give a convincing reason—which is exactly what he tried to avoid at Jackson Hole.
The market is betting on whether Waller hikes. Waller is betting on whether CPI gives him a way out.
Tonight, watch the data closely.
$BTC $ETH $XAU #PPI高于预期,今晚CPI定方向
Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more
Replies
No comments yet. Be the first to reply!


