Many people might be dissatisfied with Binance's recent Alpha score customized airdrop plan 🤔🤔 But so far, I think Binance's team has been very successful. Look, BSC's recent trading volume has surged, ranking second in 24 hours, only behind SOL. You should know, MEME is the leading sector in the recent crypto market, and SOL has risen because of MEME. BSC being able to rank second is commendable. Part of it is because of big brother cz. During the previous dog-fighting craze, although he just returned, he didn't choose to retire and slack off. He still chose to learn and research how to fight dogs, purchase on-chain, and bought the first meme $TST. No matter what, he chose to stay on the front line and persist in building with young people 🧡 The second part is because of Binance's PUA tactics. First, Binance Wallet starts with trading thresholds, new launches, and high returns. Then, it uses the amount of holdings for free airdrops, then specifies Alpha token purchases, and rewards are generous every time, higher and faster than other projects. Who can resist this? 🤯 Finally, there's the current Alpha points, adding and deducting points, etc. This has led to scrolling through Twitter every day, seeing how to reduce score wear and tear, which has already succeeded. Speaking of dissatisfaction now: 1⃣ The score requirement growth rate is too fast, many retail investors don't have the funds to consume. 2⃣ Project parties are willing to give up community shares for Binance airdrops to get listed on Binance. In the future, fewer people will be willing to build communities, and projects will only have project teams, which will ruin crypto, brother. Suggestion: It's okay to set the score line based on the number of people, but there are top universities like Tsinghua, Peking University, 985, 211, first-tier, second-tier, and vocational colleges. Why not set levels too, otherwise, it's boring for everyone, give those at the back a chance. @cz_binance @heyibinance @binancezh @BinanceWallet