What I really don't like here is the abuse of the word "credible".
Ethereum has credible neutrality because of the diversity of the validator set: with different ideals, jurisdictions and no social connection.
Anything else, especially the Chain run by a clique of aligned business partners in a single jurisdiction, cannot be credibly neutral mathematically, regardless of the virtue signaling.
I'm not against the product by any means, but we should acknowledge that it's objectively less neutral than a Binance Chain.
In Matt’s defense, I think he / Tempo is truly doing what they can to optimize for credible neutrality
What he’s not saying or admitting is that, despite Tempo's best efforts towards neutrality (if they’re real), Tempo will only ever be able to access a small fraction of the credible neutrality that the crypto community considers real.
So yes, Tempo is trying to be as credibly neutral as possible - just what’s possible in the context of a Stripe/Paradigm lead L1 is very low versus what the standard is
The standard is #Ethereum
14.67K
119
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.