I don’t know exactly how… but somehow ZK is going to help with this
Sam Altman just confirmed what lawyers have been saying for over a year:
There’s no legal privilege when you use ChatGPT.
So if you’re pasting in contracts, asking legal questions, or asking it for strategy, you’re not getting legal advice. You’re generating discoverable evidence.
No attorney-client privilege. No confidentiality. No ethical duty. No one to protect you.
It might feel private, safe, and convenient. But lawyers are bound to protect you.
ChatGPT isn’t—and can be used against you.
2.55K
1
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.