NO Hacker YES Portal Recently, a major DeFi platform @GMX_IO was hacked on the @arbitrum network, resulting in the theft of around $42 million in assets! 😵 @PortaltoBitcoin gives a great breakdown of how this massive exploit was pulled off. To beat the enemy, you must first understand them! Let’s take a quick look! 1️⃣ How Did the Hack Happen? GMX V1 has a liquidity pool called GLP, which held assets like ETH, BTC, and USDC deposited by users. The hacker used the following method: ➡️ Re-entrancy attack This is a technique where a smart contract function is repeatedly called before the balance gets updated, allowing multiple operations to sneak in undetected. Using this, the attacker minted a huge amount of fake GLP tokens (basically like printing unlimited counterfeit vouchers). These fake tokens were then swapped for real assets (ETH, BTC, USDC) and withdrawn. 🫣 Finally, the stolen funds were bridged out to other networks like Ethereum mainnet. Here is easy to say: They printed fake receipts, exchanged them for real money, and vanished. 2️⃣ Why Was This Attack Successful? GMX V1 was built using a typical DeFi architecture: Shared liquidity pool: All user assets are stored in a single contract. Mint/Burn LP tokens: Used to track liquidity provisioning. Complex on-chain logic: Handles balances, swaps, liquidation, and more within the same contract. This tightly coupled design leaves it vulnerable to re-entrancy attacks where a hacker can sneak in repeated calls before the system updates balances. Even though GMX went through multiple audits, design-level risks like pooled funds + complex logic + re-entrancy vulnerability still remained. So, while audits can reduce bugs, they can’t eliminate structural weaknesses and that’s what led to this disaster. 🥲 3️⃣ How Could This Have Been Prevented? The answer lies in what @PortaltoBitcoin is building: Atomic Swaps. Here’s how Atomic Swaps differ: ❌ No liquidity pools. ✅ Assets stay in your wallet. ✅ The swap only executes if all conditions are met. ✅ If anything fails, your funds automatically return. ✅ No contract needs to hold funds or update state. With this setup: 1⃣ There’s no vault to rob. 2⃣ No fake tokens can be minted. 3⃣ And re-entrancy attacks become impossible. It’s basically the ultimate shield against hackers! With DeFi hacks on the rise, many projects are now moving toward this kind of architecture: Atomic swaps, self-custody of user assets, and re-entrancy-proof designs. That’s why the future is looking so bright for @PortaltoBitcoin.
The $42M GMX exploit on Arbitrum didn’t need to happen. Could a single design choice have saved GMX and its LPs? Here’s exactly what happened, why it keeps happening in DeFi, and how atomic swaps would have prevented it entirely, ELI5 Style 🧵⤵️
Show original
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.