Yapyo is yet another example of "mindshare" not equating to positive price action These low-risk mindshare farming programs from last week obviously attract a certain type of crowd. I think the infofi word is super broad, but this isn’t infofi. It’s short-term hype farming through incentivized leaderboards, and the "what if" of the token going to 5/10/25M; no one wants to miss out. But after the last few, Loudio, Seedify launches, and now Yapyo, it’s very apparent that this strategy does not attract quality, affluent, sophisticated holders who are or want to be involved. Instead, it attracts people who can low/no cost farm and make a pretty penny with a high reward/low risk ratio. Game is game, but if you’re trying to build something that doesn’t become a huge joke like the above-mentioned projects, don’t emulate this formula. Create stickiness. Attract the right crowd. Have a product??? That’s good or works??? This is where I think @KaitoAI campaigns are more powerful in terms of stickiness. They’re longer. Some projects leverage the data and boards but implement their own parameters to reward people using their products or apps ( @infinex is a solid example of this ). Won’t be surprised to see more seasons out of @katana or @Calderaxyz post TGE. Some leaderboards like @PortaltoBitcoin and @multibank_io I see giga botted farmoor accounts, so hopefully there is quality control in managing who reserves rewards, but I do think that having the data from Kaito and extending the program over multiple pre and post rewards creates a more sophisticated system to reward users, create stickiness, and not cause catastrophe. Even @virtuals_io and @NEARProtocol maintaining post the campaigns is very powerful, in my opinion.