How to Debunk Berachain PUA-style Speech, Principles and Logics The criticism of Berachain from the community seems to have been heard by the project team, but it seems that it has not been fully heard from the response. Many project parties in the market are full of this kind of "post-rationalization" ineffective reflection, which at first glance seems sincere, but has no substance. If all the reflection is reflected in the "if you can do it again" statement, then this is not a reflection, this is just a market PR act. The reason is simple. 1. At the beginning, when designing tokenomics, the fairness of community distribution and VC distribution should be considered. The current so-called reflection can only show that at the beginning, they very much recognized the rationality of selling the token to the VC, rather than the so-called long-term construction. A fluttering "If you can do it all over again" is not fundamentally different from the confession of a scumbag/domestic violence man. Because there's a very clever logic in it, because once you believe in the premise of "if you can do it all over again", then his mistake becomes irrelevant. This has a term in psychology called counterfactual thinking (weakening responsibility) and cognitive dissociation (making mistakes seem unimportant). All those who do not intend to admit their mistakes are very accustomed to using hypothetical reflection to cover up their real mistakes and win sympathy. The right way to admit your mistake is why you did it at the time, and to be honest and honest about the decision you made in the first place. 2. Buybacks as a remedial measure are very unconvincing and effective. I'll just ask, where does the buyback funds come from, and whether your funds still come from the community/user contributions, is it possible that you want to issue additional tokens??? ......。 If you can't say this clearly, it's nothing more than stealing the beams and changing the pillars to continue to pay for VCs with community contributions. This is a proper term in psychology: symbolic compensation. In other words: in order to cover up the mistake, I make symbolic compensation, but this is not! Be! True! Correct! Wait! Price! Target! All people who don't intend to correct their mistakes are very accustomed to covering up their mistakes and trying to thin them out of the way. If you're really correcting a mistake, you shouldn't say you're trying to buy back, but you should publish in detail what specific actions you've done over the past period to restore the community's reputation. @berachain