هذه الصفحة هي لأغراض إعلامية فقط. قد لا تتوفر بعض الخدمات والميزات في منطقتك.

US Banking Groups Push Back Against Crypto Firms Seeking National Bank Charters

Introduction: The Growing Debate Over Crypto Firms and National Bank Charters

The intersection of cryptocurrency and traditional banking has become a focal point of regulatory and financial debate in the United States. Banking and credit union groups have recently urged the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to delay granting national bank charters to crypto firms. This push reflects growing concerns over regulatory gaps, policy risks, and the potential destabilization of the financial system. As major crypto firms like Circle Internet Group, Ripple Labs, and Fidelity Digital Assets seek national trust bank charters, the debate underscores the tension between fostering innovation and ensuring robust regulatory oversight.

What Is the OCC’s Role in Crypto Banking Licenses?

The OCC is a key federal agency responsible for regulating and supervising national banks in the United States. By granting national bank charters, the OCC allows financial institutions to operate under federal jurisdiction, bypassing the need for state-level licenses. For crypto firms, obtaining a national bank charter offers legitimacy and the ability to expand operations across the country. However, this shift has sparked questions about whether entities with fundamentally different business models from traditional banks should be granted such privileges.

Why Are Banking Groups Opposed to Crypto Bank Charters?

Traditional banking organizations have expressed strong opposition to crypto firms receiving national bank charters. Their concerns include:

  • Lack of Fiduciary Activities: Crypto firms often do not engage in traditional banking activities like deposit-taking, lending, or asset custody.

  • Transparency Issues: Banking groups have called for greater transparency in the charter application process, including public disclosures and detailed scrutiny.

  • Regulatory Risks: Critics argue that crypto firms operating as banks could undermine longstanding OCC policies and introduce risks to the financial system.

These concerns highlight the broader challenges of integrating crypto firms into the traditional banking framework.

Traditional Fiduciary Activities vs. Crypto Business Models

A key point of contention is the difference between traditional fiduciary responsibilities and the business models of crypto firms. Traditional banks engage in activities like:

  • Asset custody

  • Lending

  • Deposit-taking

In contrast, many crypto firms focus on:

  • Blockchain technology

  • Stablecoin issuance

  • Decentralized finance (DeFi) services

Critics argue that these activities do not align with the fiduciary standards expected of national banks, raising doubts about whether crypto firms can meet the responsibilities associated with a national charter.

How Stablecoin Laws Influence Crypto Banking Licenses

Stablecoin legislation, such as the GENIUS Act, has added complexity to the debate. These laws incentivize stablecoin issuers to apply for national trust bank charters, enabling them to:

  • Expand operations beyond stablecoin issuance

  • Avoid state-by-state licensing requirements

While this could streamline operations for crypto firms, it also raises concerns about regulatory loopholes and the broader implications for the financial system. Legal experts predict that stablecoin laws will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of banking licenses for crypto firms.

Federal vs. State-Level Regulation: A Key Debate

Crypto firms are increasingly seeking national bank charters to operate under a unified federal framework, avoiding the complexities of state-level regulations. While federal oversight offers consistency, it also introduces challenges, such as:

  • Ensuring adequate regulatory scrutiny

  • Addressing the unique risks posed by crypto business models

This federal-versus-state dynamic is a critical aspect of the debate, as stakeholders weigh the benefits of streamlined regulation against potential risks to the financial system.

Risks to the US Financial System From Crypto Firms as Banks

Granting national trust bank charters to crypto firms represents a significant departure from traditional OCC policy. Critics warn that this shift could:

  • Destabilize the financial system by introducing entities with unconventional business models

  • Create competitive pressures on traditional banks, forcing them to adapt or risk losing market share

These risks underscore the broader implications of integrating crypto firms into the banking sector and highlight the need for careful regulatory oversight.

Legal Challenges Over Trust Charters

Legal experts anticipate litigation over whether trust charters can serve as de facto bank charters with reduced regulatory burdens. The debate centers on:

  • The definition of trust charters

  • Whether they provide crypto firms with an unfair competitive advantage

This legal uncertainty adds another layer of complexity to the issue, as stakeholders grapple with redefining regulatory frameworks to accommodate emerging financial technologies.

Competition Between Traditional Banks and Crypto Firms

The growing competition between traditional banks and crypto firms has created an unusual alliance between banks and credit unions, united in their opposition to crypto firms entering the banking sector. Key concerns include:

  • Disruption of traditional banking models

  • Pressure on banks to convert to trust companies to avoid stricter regulations

While competition can drive innovation, it also raises questions about the long-term stability of the financial system and the role of regulatory oversight in maintaining balance.

Conclusion: The Future of Banking and Crypto Integration

The debate over granting national bank charters to crypto firms is far from resolved. As the OCC evaluates applications from crypto entities, it must balance the need for innovation with the imperative to safeguard the financial system. Concerns about policy risks, fiduciary activities, and regulatory gaps highlight the challenges of integrating crypto firms into the banking sector. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of financial services in the United States, influencing how traditional banks and crypto firms coexist in an evolving financial landscape.

إخلاء المسؤولية
يتم توفير هذا المحتوى لأغراض إعلامية فقط وقد يغطي منتجات غير متوفرة في منطقتك. وليس المقصود منه تقديم (1) نصيحة أو توصية استثمارية، (2) أو عرض أو التماس لشراء العملات الرقمية أو الأصول الرقمية أو بيعها أو الاحتفاظ بها، أو (3) استشارة مالية أو محاسبية أو قانونية أو ضريبية. تنطوي عمليات الاحتفاظ بالعملات الرقمية/الأصول الرقمية، بما فيها العملات المستقرة، على درجة عالية من المخاطرة، ويُمكِن أن تشهد تقلّبًا كبيرًا في قيمتها. لذا، ينبغي لك التفكير جيدًا فيما إذا كان تداول العملات الرقمية أو الأصول الرقمية أو الاحتفاظ بها مناسبًا لك حسب وضعك المالي. يُرجى استشارة خبير الشؤون القانونية أو الضرائب أو الاستثمار لديك بخصوص أي أسئلة مُتعلِّقة بظروفك الخاصة. المعلومات (بما في ذلك بيانات السوق والمعلومات الإحصائية، إن وُجدت) الموجودة في هذا المنشور هي معروضة لتكون معلومات عامة فقط. وعلى الرغم من كل العناية المعقولة التي تم إيلاؤها لإعداد هذه البيانات والرسوم البيانية، فنحن لا نتحمَّل أي مسؤولية أو التزام عن أي أخطاء في الحقائق أو سهو فيها.

© 2025 OKX. تجوز إعادة إنتاج هذه المقالة أو توزيعها كاملةً، أو استخدام مقتطفات منها بما لا يتجاوز 100 كلمة، شريطة ألا يكون هذا الاستخدام لغرض تجاري. ويجب أيضًا في أي إعادة إنتاج أو توزيع للمقالة بكاملها أن يُذكر ما يلي بوضوح: "هذه المقالة تعود ملكيتها لصالح © 2025 OKX وتم الحصول على إذن لاستخدامها." ويجب أن تُشِير المقتطفات المسموح بها إلى اسم المقالة وتتضمَّن الإسناد المرجعي، على سبيل المثال: "اسم المقالة، [اسم المؤلف، إن وُجد]، © 2025 OKX." قد يتم إنشاء بعض المحتوى أو مساعدته بواسطة أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي (AI). لا يجوز إنتاج أي أعمال مشتقة من هذه المقالة أو استخدامها بطريقة أخرى.

المقالات ذات الصلة

عرض المزيد
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

Shiba Inu's Ecosystem Expansion and Market Momentum: Can SHIB Flip Bitcoin Cash?

Shiba Inu Price Rally: Key Drivers and Future Outlook Shiba Inu (SHIB) has captured the attention of the cryptocurrency market with its recent price rally. Over the past week, SHIB has surged by 6.5%, contributing to a 22% increase over two weeks and a 30% rally in certain cases. Despite these gains, SHIB remains down 15% year-over-year, reflecting the inherent volatility of meme coins. This article explores the factors driving SHIB's price movements, its ecosystem developments, and the challenges it faces in sustaining long-term growth.
‏24 يوليو 2025
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

Altcoin Season 2025: Predictions, Challenges, and Opportunities for Crypto Traders

What Is Altcoin Season? Definition and Historical Context Altcoin season refers to a period in the cryptocurrency market when alternative cryptocurrencies, commonly known as altcoins, outperform Bitcoin in terms of price growth and trading volume. These periods are often characterized by significant shifts in market dynamics, typically triggered by specific conditions such as Bitcoin dominance peaking or liquidity flowing into altcoins.
‏24 يوليو 2025
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

Cardano (ADA) Signals Bullish Momentum as Whales Accumulate and DeFi Projects Gain Traction

Cardano Price Predictions and Technical Analysis Cardano (ADA) has emerged as a prominent player in the cryptocurrency market, with its price currently trading between $0.62 and $0.71. Technical indicators suggest a potential breakout toward resistance levels of $0.70–$0.75, driven by bullish momentum. Notably, ADA has surpassed its 200-day moving average near $0.64, a critical milestone that often signals upward price movement.
‏24 يوليو 2025