how else could you get rekt as a YT-holder?
the project not launching =
• liquidity woes
• opportunity cost
• drawdown on yields
• points become redundant
while the leverage on yields and points can be enticing, the inherent risk is > PT/LP holders
didn’t think we’d see this for @Terminal_fi
anything can happen in crypto - we can be bullish but we also need to be objective
.@Terminal_fi wasn’t a rushed project.
It was fully built, audited, and ready, but the chain it depended on never launched.
When @convergeonchain didn’t go live, the whole plan lost its foundation.
They decided to shut it down the clean way:
> All deposits refunded 1:1
> Full codebase released
> No forced launch just to save face
> All rewards still given (@ethena_labs Sats, Etherfi points, sUSDe yield, minus the Terminal airdrop)
It sucks for everyone involved, but being honest now avoids a bigger mess later.
My take:
I was only in LPs, so I mainly lost opportunity time and terminal airdrop. YT holders took the real hit.
And yeah, this is a reminder:
> points mean nothing if the project never reaches TGE.
> YT isn’t a guaranteed printer
So ape into YT wisely, unexpected situations like this do happen.
We saw something similar with Level before it shut down, though the story was different. Level only returned deposits. Hopefully Terminal delivers all earned rewards and maybe compensates those who burned their YT.
Tough ending, but I respect the call.
Now we wait for updates on how much base yield we’ll actually receive.
1,093
12
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。