Reading this, I can’t help but agree — we’ve been treating digital infrastructure like a private product, when it’s already the backbone of public life.
If the foundation of the global internet is controlled by a few companies, then it isn’t infrastructure — it’s dependency.
That’s why the “Second Age” of Polkadot matters. It’s about rebuilding the digital base layer to be open, verifiable, and accountable to the people who rely on it — not a handful of platforms.
Public infrastructure should actually be public.
Digital infrastructure is now public infrastructure; we just haven’t started treating it that way.
When roads or power grids fail, we fix them collectively.
When digital systems fail, we hope private companies step in.
This is backwards.
If the internet is going to be the foundation of global society, the systems beneath it must be: open, verifiable, resistant to unilateral control, and most of all, accountable to the people who rely on them.
The Second Age of @Polkadot is about designing digital infrastructure that behaves like infrastructure, not a product owned by a handful of companies.
1,801
15
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。