Neobanks are the needed Fintech UX upgrade for a new wave of Stablecoinusers not in the US
We are vastly overestimating how much power states still have to control capital flows in today’s world
In the coming years, we are entering a period of monetary wars, as we approach major global debt maturities and central banks have already been buying gold instead of Treasuries for some time now.
This is not a “dollar problem.” rather, even as a euro user, I can now easily choose whether I want EUR exposure via my bank account or USD exposure via my Stablecoin neobank.
Stablecoin neobanks are the fintech upgrade of what we previously had. They also actually allow you to spend your dollars as a German living in Germany—easily.
Before, I could hold dollars through Interactive Brokers, but I couldn’t spend them easily. There was a lot of friction between holding dollars, converting them into euros, and spending them in the real economy.
I see people making the same mistakes they made with their takes on @Tether_to. The main market is not the U.S.; in the U.S., only non-dollar stablecoins or neobanks would be relevant if the dollar were losing monetary dominance. Besides self custody and maybe privacy which is more important in authoritarian states the user is getting more or less the same product arguable worse due to not beeing FDIC insured they already have.
The real market is everyone outside the U.S. (basically the rest of the world) who wants to hold dollars easily and spend them easily without dealing with the UX issues of being fully on-chain.
Stop talking about the bull- or bearmarket and open your eyes

1,858
4
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

