Most people think “XRP staking” means wrapping risk or CEX custody. What @moremarketsxyz and Firelight are actually shipping is cleaner: FXRP stays in the Flare stack, gets deployed to Firelight vaults, and you mint stXRP that can earn protocol fees when coverage is bought real demand, not vibes. Flare’s own update laid the groundwork for the XRP Earn Account, and Firelight’s Nov 2025 mainnet notes confirm stXRP + fee-based rewards as Phase 2 rolls in.
I like the design because custody and execution are separated: deposits live in the Flare/XRPL model, strategies rotate under the hood, and rewards are sourced from actual cover fees rather than temporary emissions. MoreMarkets’ also shows they’ve been wiring in institutional-style routes (Term, Aave, etc.) this adds a second income stream via Firelight’s cover market.
❯ What changes: passive XRP becomes stXRP with fee share potential
❯ Why it matters: fee revenues scale with DeFi usage, not just incentives
❯ Who benefits: self-custody users who want institutional mechanics without CEX trade-offs
Dev note: expose a simple “coverage fees earned” stat per account so power users can track fee share vs. incentives over time. Claim check: if cover uptake grows post-mainnet, the thesis holds; if it stalls, rewards tilt back toward incentives.
I’m tracking stXRP supply, fee accrual, and Flare TVL next. Also looping STBL here since they’ve been pushing for self-custody yield done right

2,637
125
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

