I don't think this makes sense in any case. The idea of bribing start-up projects in any other ecosystem has failed so badly. In Ethereum projects simply raise their own capital outside the foundation, rather than the foundation taking risk on projects. That's how you develop independent champions, not subsidising (and picking) winners.
I've been thinking about the ecosystem allocation of HYPE which is a substancial portion of the supply. I think those expecting future airdrops from this portion of the HYPE are misguided. Few ideas: > Each Hyperliquid product is Hyperliquid aligned eg HIP-3 DEXs are required to stake 500K HYPE in order to participate market deployments. Aligned stbalecoins are required to stake 200K HYPE to be a quote asset and another 800K to become an aligned stablecoin with fee benefits. > The Hyperliquid grand vision is to house the entirety and these new financial products require HYPE stake in order to launch. > I think this large pocket of HYPE is not going to be used for supply-side incentives. But instead be used by the foundation to aid in teams launching new products that cannot afford the HYPE staked amounts in exchange for directing revenue back to the AF. > The ecosystem tokens would then be used as starting capital for Hyperliquid startups. Allowing more teams to build products in exchange for a portion of their revenue directed to HYPE buybacks. This to me makes much more sense rather than a new points season for retail traders and is in fact a much more productive use of capital.
2,085
12
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。