Transparency talk is cheap; @noble_xyz makes it inspectable. You don’t have to trust a press release go look. Pull up Mintscan → noble-1 and you can read blocks, txs, IBC packets, the whole thing. I even spot-checked a random tx to confirm fees are literally paid in USDC on-chain (no mystery gas) it’s right there in the explorer. ❯
Where USDN reserves come in: the backing isn’t hand-waved. USDN rides the M^0 framework where permissioned Validators verify Minters’ off-chain collateral and sign updates; their keys and responsibilities are public in the docs. In plain English: there’s a named party on the hook for attesting the collateral every time it changes so you can track accountability instead of vibes. ❯
If you want to sanity-check the whole stack the way I do:
❯ Open Mintscan → noble-1 and read recent USDN transfers; click into the tx to see fee in USDC + memo/IBC info.
❯ Skim M^0 docs → Validators / Validator Role & Security Controls to see who signs collateral updates and what exactly they attest.
❯ Cross-read Noble’s USDC page for the fee model (USDC-as-gas; ~1¢ internal, zero IBC fee), which is why audits are practical for normal users.
In a cycle full of depegs, transparency that you can click beats claims you can’t. Keep earning if that’s your setup but keep verifying. If you find something interesting in the data, tag me; I love a good block-by-block rabbit hole

3,943
132
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

