If crypto drifts lower it will not be because of the agencies who are no longer participating thru channels broken by 10/10 but by-asset crosswinds elsewhere (surprising T1 TCO sell, recession, AI CAPEX boom, etc)
$50B: the total amount of visible spot flow from ETF and TCos traceable to BTC and ETH since the start of July (so last 3 months). It is your call to evaluate how many degrees removed / connected that is to crypto specific firms (allocators and/or facilitators)
The questions I have instead are:
a) have vulnerable firms sold and,
b) if not, can they / will they sell here & what are their bottlenecks. That’s it
Part of advancing past the 4Y cycle notion is evolving beyond the traditionalists. The cleanest way of doing so is showing that their participation is no longer needed
The incentive to be bearish here is high stakes. Falling here helps enforce 4Y cycle theory and the lifeline that market fractals may still be uncharged
Continuation upward circumvents this and makes this school of thought (TA, “signals” extinct), comprising edge erasure
Look at the ppl who are bearish vs those who are not. You can classify them by class/year joining CT (with some small exceptions, like those who are just bearish 24/7)
1.5萬
66
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。