Balancer, Beets, Stream, Morphos… stay safe out there.
The unfortunate truth is that there's an inverse relationship between privacy and public safety when it comes to crypto hack/exploits.
Let’s be clear — no number of audits can make any technology 100% secure. Fortune 500 companies spend millions each year on cybersecurity and audits, yet hackers still breach their systems. It’s not because those companies or service providers are incompetent. CT shouldn't be so quick to point fingers and blame the project team, auditors, etc.
Even with massive budgets, large organizations operate highly complex environments where human and process risks persist. Attackers only need to exploit ONE flaw, while defenders must protect EVERYTHING, all the time — and the threat landscape evolves faster than ever.
To put it simply: Attackers only need to succeed once; defenders must succeed always.
That’s the unfair advantage hackers have. A single misconfiguration, unpatched system, malicious vendor, or zero-day exploit can undo even the most robust defenses.
2,406
33
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。