Underrated aspect of using oTokens as airdrops is the tax liability. oTokens are worthless until exercised so claiming them doesn't create inherent sell pressure.
For any airdrop (whether I'm bullish or bearish on the ecosystem) I sell ~50% into $USDC and set aside for taxes. If I don't and token is down only then I end up owe more in taxes than the tokens may be worth.
oTokens would reduce any income tax liability and only create a taxable event after exercised and then sold.
Airdrops should structure themselves as option tokens that need to be exercised to unlock allo. A combination of onchain & off chain/social activities can be leveraged to reduce the amount of capital you need to exercise the option.
This can and should also apply to team tokens where certain metrics (in addition to time) need to be met for team to unlock their allo.
If your product is good people will be motivated to participate in the ecosystem.
Everyone is aligned.
Let's use @berachain as an example. At launch bera was trading at $14.00. If you were airdropped 1000 $bera your income tax liability in the US would be 20-33% of 14k. If you didn't sell part of your airdrop to cover your tax liability you would have been rekt if you waited a bit before selling any.
Now imagine the allocation was 1000 $oBera which doesn't have value until exercised. Berachain could then say that those tokens get exercised if you earn X amount of $BGT or maybe some other actions that are off chain.
The result is no immediate tax pressure, and those aligned with the ecosystem will be able to unlock their tokens. KOLs would be incentivized to explore the eco rather than dump and bridge..
Anyways curious what you guys think @SmokeyTheBera @intern @keoneHD
3,407
9
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。