2 天前
XLS-70 and XLS-80 define the identity and permissioning layers for XRPL’s proposed lending protocol. They control who can borrow, lend, issue, or interact. If these break, the protocol breaks with them. Both are in scope for the $200K @rippleXDev XRPL Attackathon on Immunefi.
@RippleXDev XLS-70 introduces Credentials. These are on-ledger attestations issued by trusted parties. They can include KYC outcomes, risk scores, or regulatory flags. Loans and other actions can be gated based on these credentials.
@RippleXDev Credentials are referenced, not stored, in most cases. They are linked to XRPL accounts and consumed by the protocol to permit or reject actions. If this link is broken or spoofed, all downstream enforcement may fail.
@RippleXDev XLS-80 defines Permissioned Domains. This standard allows asset issuers or protocol operators to set access rules. Domains can restrict issuance, redemptions, or interactions to credentialed or whitelisted accounts.
@RippleXDev Combined, these two standards enforce: • Who can borrow • Who can lend • Who can interact with tokens • What entities qualify under regulatory frameworks These are not cosmetic features. They are protocol gatekeepers.
@RippleXDev Vulnerabilities may include: • Bypassing credential checks • Credential injection or spoofing • Inconsistent domain enforcement • Improper issuer or trust line scoping If you can break access logic, you control who gets to move what.
1,870
10
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。