ENS is dead and will eventually be eliminated by time!
A. From a decentralization perspective:
1. .sol and .ton have hundreds of millions of users, and their number is steadily growing!
2. Compared to .ton and .sol, their renewal models are very user-friendly. However, ENS's high renewal fees mean you don't actually own ENS; you're just leasing .ETH! You're just leasing an NFT.
3. Compared to .sol, ENS treats its users with extreme arrogance. They can auction domain names on the registration page, but they don't allow users to list or auction them.
B. From a centralized perspective:
1. In terms of popularity and user scale, .com and .net far surpass ENS.
2. The renewal costs of .com and .net are also better than ENS.
3. From a practical perspective, .com and .net can import ENS and take full advantage of its features. If you don't own ENS but only rent it, then a .com domain is more practical.
C. Disorganized team management, lack of product innovation and brand promotion
Since Brantly's departure, there has been no new innovation or promotion. Excellent Vision trading platforms have all collapsed, and ENS currently lacks even a single good trading platform. ENS has become non-essential, lacking interaction with influencers and users!
In short, whether from a decentralized or centralized perspective, ENS will be eliminated without innovation and a continuous focus on user experience. Hopefully, a new domain name system will emerge on Ethereum to replace ENS. Without competition, there can be no innovation!
@ENS_DAO @ensdomains @broker_ens @forlbb @blockchainjames @BrantlyMillegan @nicksdjohnson
2.22萬
56
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。