It’s functionally impossible and wildly uneconomical to use Bitcoin for storing data. That’s why we have Arweave. Will the Bitcoin maxis ever come to terms with this and stop the infighting?
> Increasing Blocksize increases centralization, again, diminishing its role as a more perfect form of money. (Read, “Blocksize Wars”) Yes, one should read "The Blocksize War". The OP_RETURN size limit has been 1MB for well over a decade. A recent version of Bitcoin Core has increased the OP_RETURN relay policy filter limit, not the actual size limit. This recent change is not a blocksize limit increase. In Chapter 2 of "The Blocksize War" it explains one of the key reasons why we need a blocksize limit, because otherwise the chain will be full of loads of spam or as the book puts it "music collection or encrypted documents". The small blockers won the war. We have a reasonable blocksize limit in place. This protects us from the spam. Filters are not effective at stopping transactions people want to make. Only a tiny minority of nodes need to ignore the filters and then the filters wont work at all. We should not fight an unwinnable war. And to the extent the filters do work at reducing the propagation of transactions people want to make, that causes centralization pressure, pretty much the same kind of centralization pressure the small blockers fought to stop in the blocksize war. Filters are not a robust long term solution to fighting against mining incentives or fighting against spam. Bitcon should not rely on ineffective measures like filters. The blocksize limit is that robust long term solution. Chapter 2 Extract > Small blockers also believed full blocks were inevitable anyway. After all, if blockspace was available, why not use it up? Anyone could store anything they liked in the blockchain, for instance their music collection or encrypted documents. Demand for cheap, highly-replicated storage was essentially unbounded, they argued. Asking for the limit to increase above expected demand was therefore nonsense. Indeed, one person could easily fill all the space up themselves. The retort to this point from the larger blockers circled back to the mining incentive argument; miners would not do this, they claimed, miners would not let this amount of data in the blocks.
2,779
19
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。