The REV debates are completely missing the point. Of course revenue for chains (like any business or protocol) are important. It isn't the only important metric but it certainly IS an important metric. The thing that the REV maxis are getting wrong is that REV is only as good as you can project out its sustainability. The things most blockchains do poorly is retaining earnings for growth to invest in trying to sustain REV. If there is a lesson of the challenges that Ethereum has faced it is that it generated billions of dollars in fees over a multi-year period and it couldn't sustain it because there was no mechanism to reinvest in its success. I believe @arbitrum is the furthest along in trying to solve this, and that's why I believe it will be the world's largest digital sovereign nation.
4,422
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。