Imo misleading to take a victory lap about sustainability from lucky revenue from a black swan on a 1-day basis. Aero is still at massive negative net revenue on nearly any non-cherry-picked timeframe. And framing Uni and Curve as "sustainable" rev comps is pretty strange given that Uni targets no revenue (for better or worse), and Curve really targets pools driven by token rewards (with possible exception of YB but let's see)
5 天前
In the last 24h, @AerodromeFi emitted ~$500k in $AERO emissions to LPs + made ~$1.4M in revenue. Slipstreams ability to keep liquidity sticky while dynamically adjusting fees is unparalleled. Quick check on the "sustainable" folks: UNI: $0, CRV: $500k, Fluid Multisig: $17k.
I don't see anything on Artemis (or maybe the page isn't working), feel free to drop a link Re Uni and Curve: maybe I missed it. Would indeed be odd for Curve given that they pioneered and still use the ve model that Aerodrome uses Someone could still reasonably comment about unsustainability even if they aren't targeting sustainable revenue themselves though
@wagmiAlexander @XPordria I also don’t know where the quoted numbers are coming from or how “gross emissions” and “active revenue” are defined
@wagmiAlexander @XPordria @DefiLlama @artemis (note defillama uses USD value of emissions instead of "native" units too)
1.59万
20
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。