#SECProposesCryptoRules

397,8k ser på|257 innlegg

About SECProposesCryptoRules

SEC reportedly proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, offering exemptions and a safe harbor from registration for some crypto investment contracts. Examples: $5M over four years for startups and $75M over 12 months for fundraising; final terms await the text. The safe harbor addresses when tokens may leave securities rules after a team completes or permanently ends its core work. CLARITY covers asset classification, SEC-CFTC roles and markets. Can SEC rules create a workable path and align with Cong

SECProposesCryptoRules Populære innlegg

gián nè
gián nè
🚨 $XRP : REGULATION IS BECOMING THE CATALYST The U.S. regulatory landscape is moving again. The SEC has now proposed a new crypto framework that could provide clearer rules for digital assets. For XRP, regulatory clarity matters more than another short-term chart pattern. If uncertainty keeps falling, institutional adoption becomes easier to imagine. The next XRP move may be driven by policy — not hype.
Solana Legend 🎒💧
Solana Legend 🎒💧
A tree falls in the woods but no one cares. Today the SEC put forth a safe harbor for legal USA ICOs. This kind of headline would have sent BTC and SOL +10-15% in in 2021 The feeling of apathy is palpable. It feels like we are in the time based capitulation phase of the market.
Injective 🥷
Injective 🥷
🔥 PSA: The SEC has just released new rules: Regulation Crypto Assets. Crypto would finally get a common sense framework for crypto assets. Full text 👇️
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
🚨 TODAY: The SEC proposed new rules, “Regulation Crypto Assets,” that would create a clear and fit-for-purpose framework for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets.
Birdie_OKX
Birdie_OKX
The important feature of the SEC’s reported proposal is not the headline fundraising limits, but the attempt to define a transition path. Exemptions of $5M over four years for startups and $75M over 12 months for fundraising could matter, yet the safe-harbor question is more structural: when can a token cease to fall under securities rules after a team completes or permanently ends its core work? If the final text aligns that test with CLARITY’s treatment of asset classification, SEC-CFTC roles and markets, it could reduce ambiguity without removing accountability. Until the text is available, the framework matters more than the numbers. Not advice, just analysis. #SECProposesCryptoRules
B_Legend
B_Legend
🚨 JUST IN 🇺🇸 The SEC has just proposed a new regulatory framework specifically tailored for crypto assets in the U.S. “Regulation Crypto Assets” could create clearer pathways for crypto projects to raise capital legally in the U.S.: • 💰 Up to $5M — a one-time exemption over a 4-year period. • 💰 Up to $75M — an alternative exemption for each 12-month period, with disclosure, financial statements, and ongoing reporting requirements. • 🛡️ Safe Harbor — under certain conditions, once an issuer has completed or permanently ceased the essential managerial efforts it promised under an investment contract, the crypto asset could potentially no longer be treated as an “investment contract.” In simple terms: A token being initially sold through a transaction subject to securities laws does not necessarily mean the token must remain a security forever. The SEC says the proposal aims to provide greater regulatory clarity, reduce incentives for crypto projects to operate offshore, and make it easier for innovation and capital formation to happen in the U.S. Back in the day, news like this would send Crypto straight to the moon. 🚀 Now… Crypto: “Okay… and?” 😂 "Source: U.S. SEC" ( #Interlink #ITLG #ITL
Kashif Raza
Kashif Raza
SEC Chair Paul Atkins: SEC is taking its "most historic step" to modernise securities rules for CRYPTO. U.S must remain the crypto capital of the world. Giving innovators a clear path to raise capital and build crypto networks in the U.S
Justin Slaughter
Justin Slaughter
I think the rule language indicates the SEC hasn’t committed fully to either path but is leaving itself a fair amount of flexibility here to see what emerges during the comment period. This is probably going to be one of the top three areas of contention in comments.
_gabrielShapir0
_gabrielShapir0
the SEC could've cabined things either by going with the Cohen doctrine (secondary sales are not part of the investment contract scheme) or by requiring the "promises or representations" to be fairly explicit (rejecting LBRY incentive alignment reasoning)...either one would (imo) depart from Howey, but it had to be cabined somehow to make this manageable...they went with the latter...so teams will be incentivized to promise/represent very little from now on...question is how limited they can be while still making the token attractive to buy. . .
Nate Geraci
Nate Geraci
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce off the top rope… “A whole generation has struggled with the SEC’s insistence, without regard for adverse effects on investors & entrepreneurs, that people apply a set of inapt rules to crypto.” In less than two years, SEC’s approach to crypto has gone from harsh regulation by enforcement to commonsense regulation aimed at fostering innovation. Love to see it.
MartyParty
MartyParty
SEC Chair Paul Atkins says the SEC itself was "weaponized" against crypto, as he unveils its most historic step yet. Atkins says Regulation Crypto Assets answers the question "that has puzzled innovators since the birth of the blockchain," letting projects raise capital before their networks go live. He adds the SEC still expects the CLARITY Act to reach "the President's desk." Ive been waiting for #RegCrypto since 2018.
Muyao
Muyao
crypto finally got its clarification on ICOs from the SEC. Now the question is, who's going to launch an ICO?