Satoshi Saturday:
21 Million $BTC. 21 Billion $DGB. Simple math, real scarcity.
There will only ever be 1 $BTC for every 1000 $DGB. Satoshi math. ✅
🧠 Today is Satoshi Saturday — Let's Talk Scarcity, Math & Legacy ⚡️
Everyone knows Bitcoin has a hard supply cap of 21 million $BTC, but did you know DigiByte follows the same math — just scaled 1,000× to 21 billion $DGB?
So, 1 BTC = 1,000 $DGB in terms of scarcity.
Let’s break it down 👇
1️⃣ The Cap: 21 Million vs 21 Billion
Bitcoin’s supply is permanently limited to 21,000,000 BTC.
DigiByte mirrors that model — but with 21,000,000,000 DGB, exactly 1,000× more units.
Mathematically, owning 1 BTC today = 1,000 DGB in scarcity ratio.
Both represent the same percentage of their total supply.
2️⃣ Satoshi Stated:
“Total circulation will be 21,000,000 coins.
It’ll be distributed to network nodes when they make blocks, with the amount cut in half every 4 years.”
— Satoshi Nakamoto, 2009
That’s the first time he defined Bitcoin’s total cap and halving schedule — a mathematical framework DigiByte still uses today.
3️⃣ Why 21 Million? (Satoshi’s Email to Mike Hearn, April 2009)
In his now-historic email explaining the logic behind Bitcoin’s supply and divisibility, Satoshi wrote:
“My choice for the number of coins and distribution schedule was an educated guess.
It was a difficult choice, because once the network is going it’s locked in and we’re stuck with it.
I wanted to pick something that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that’s very hard.
I ended up picking something in the middle.
If Bitcoin remains a small niche, it’ll be worth less per unit than existing currencies.
If you imagine it being used for some fraction of world commerce, then there’s only going to be 21 million coins for the whole world, so it would be worth much more per unit.
Values are 64-bit integers with 8 decimal places, so 1 coin is represented internally as 100000000.
There’s plenty of granularity if typical prices become small.
For example, if 0.001 is worth 1 Euro, then it might be easier to change where the decimal point is displayed, so if you had 1 Bitcoin it’s now displayed as 1000, and 0.001 is displayed as 1.”
— Satoshi to Mike Hearn (2009 Email Archive)
That single paragraph reveals his entire logic:
If Bitcoin ever went global, the unit representation would need to expand — either by moving the decimal point or by having more visible units.
In other words:
If Bitcoin were to reach mainstream adoption, its economy would effectively look like a 21 billion-unit system.
4️⃣ DigiByte = That Vision Realized
DigiByte kept Satoshi’s exact supply ratio — but scaled it 1,000× for real-world usability.
More visible units, same scarcity, faster confirmations.
It’s not inflation — it’s accessibility at scale.
The same cryptographic scarcity Satoshi designed, but adapted for a global-use blockchain.
1 $BTC = 1,000 $DGB in supply ratio
Both are finite, decentralized & mathematically sound
5️⃣ What It Means Today
Bitcoin proved that digital scarcity works.
DigiByte extends that principle for global utility.
🌍 21 million BTC
🌎 21 billion DGB
Same math. Same principle. Same dream — a decentralized world economy.
🎉 Happy #SatoshiSaturday — remembering the genius who foresaw that one day, humanity would need digital money with both scarcity and scalability 🔵

9,29k
157
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.