$SBET I am absolutely no expert in reading these SEC docs so take this with grain of salt... But what I've underlined in red, blue, and green here all seem to have been previously announced To me that shows that the orange underline is the only new dilution here, which is about 10 million shares Now nobody loves 10 million share dilution into 59 million, but that doesn't seem worth of -75% on a stock that everyone already knows will likely use dilution to raise funds to buy $ETH as they've previously stated To me, I wonder if an algo misread this document and went wild, thinking this was all new dilution Or, there is something I simply completely don't understand about what this document says, which is also possible
$SBET absolutely smoked after hours on news of a new offering, but from what I can tell from the document it's about ~17 million new shares aside from the 59 million already existing from May 30 Seems like an algo gone wild or something?
@ethereumjoseph any clarity you can provide I'm sure everyone would appreciate
Furthermore, in this filing dated May 30, they previously announced up to $1 billion of dilution, so nothing here is a surprise
$SBET market cap @ 59.4 million shares @ $9/sh = $534 million If we include the 10.4 million share dilution from this filing, that puts us at 69.8 million shares @ $9/sh = $628 million They hold $425 million of $ETH After this decline they are very nearly trading at NAV
My math was a little off on the final shares outstanding as even though only 10.4 million of the warrants are new, none of the warrants at all have been exercised yet, so they aren't in the current shares outstanding The doc clarifies this much further down that the final shares outstanding after all exercised warrants would be 77.5 million shares @ $9/sh market cap would be ~$700mm
Okay one more note, there's potentially another ~46,500 unvested options and RSUs out there that could vest at some point; no vesting date mentioned These are usually employee compensation
Looks like there's some clarity here from Consensys on another part of the doc that people/algos may be misinterpreting
The filing is a standard SEC resale registration statement with all participants shares being registered as part of the registration. It does not reflect any actual sales or anyone's sales being sold (which may or may not happen, I have no idea). But it's a basic registration statement. Of course all the shares get registered.
836
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.