Agents aren’t useful if they can’t do stuff, get paid, and coordinate without trusting a middleman. That’s why Nexus matters: @Talus_Labs turned “agent hype” into rails tools you can compose, workflows that actually execute, and on-chain settlement you can verify. I read the whitepaper + litepaper and the design clicks. Nexus standardizes Talus Tools and chains them into DAG workflows; a Leader layer handles off-chain calls, then pushes results back to Sui so money logic stays transparent. On top, Talus defines two native markets: a Market for Tools (devs meter usage, earn per call) and a Market for Agents. It’s a business model, not a bounty board. ❯ If you build: wrap a data/API or model endpoint as a Tool, set pricing, compose a small policy (data → decide → act), and let Nexus handle delivery-versus-payment. ❯ If you’re new: skim docs, then ship one minimal workflow watch fees, events, and how clean the authority model feels on Sui. My read: this is the missing “glue” for autonomous apps execution you can audit, plus native monetization so builders don’t live off tips. If they keep decentralizing Leaders and harden the fee rails, you’ve got the backbone for an actual agent economy.
1.07萬
164
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。