hypecoin price

Upgrades, roadmaps, Testnets, announcements, etc, etc None of it is relevant until the gap is closed with #1. Looking in the mirror when I point that out…

Using TBills as collateral? Or simply investing in them with ease on-chain? You can do it on @HyperliquidX + HyperEVM, @base, and @arbitrum with thBILL 👇

Last cycle the weakness in solunavax signaled the end of times. Had a few mini rallies after (near and others) that didn't last long and the entire market dropped. Monitoring hype, fartcoin, sui?, and maybe a few others but things don't look that promising. August might be for touching grass.

4 days ago I called $SYRUP and it is now up 18% while $ETH is down 2% and my main bag $HYPE is down 8% Suffering from success

Mysten validators are shipping 1.52 () today, bringing a HUGE upgrade for not only @DeepBookonSui but also Aftermath's fully onchain perpetual product. I wanted to write a quick thread before some cmo/sui kol writes some poorly researched slop that misrepresents this feature which I think this is one of the best developments coming out of Mysten right now. There's been a lot of discussion about prioritizing cancels following Hyperliquid's success (I'm a big fan of HL). However, I believe that approach only works in Hyperliquid's specific environment, not on a general-purpose L1 like Sui. One of the things that I personally don't like about cancel prioritization is my concern about potentially toxic cancels where mms could game the system by waiting for cancels or canel if fill isn’t good for them or something that negatively impacts takers. One thing I'm happy about is that engaging in spoofing behaviors aren't as easy on Aftermath since we're fully onchain. What this PR actually does is it exposes reference gas price (RGP) and actual gas price to smart contracts through a new TxContext function. This enables contracts to access the current epoch's minimum gas price (set by validators WHICH NEED TO BE LOWERED!!) and what users actually paid. But here's why it's a big deal to me and deepbook, this creates the foundation for contract level txs prioritization. Meaning I can implement logic where makers who pay above a certain gas price threshold (customizable in the contracts) get their cancels processed with priority over standard taker transactions. Since makers can see both the reference price and know they need to pay at least X amount above it, this creates a fair, transparent, market driven prioritization mechanism without the toxic gaming possible in closed systems. This imo is a really good hybrid solution!