The token distribution dispute between Aave and WLFI. When I first saw the clause "20% revenue sharing + 7% token allocation," I thought it sounded like something written by an intern at WLFI, completely unlike a deal signed by the Trump family. It's important to note that the collaboration between Aave and Spark only offered a 10% revenue share. With the Trump brand backing WLFI, it would be reasonable to expect Aave to have to subsidize a bit to make it work. Even if WLFI was trying to raise funds at the time, they shouldn't have come up with such poor terms. Later on, as the new crypto policies took off, WLFI issued USD1, and the narrative jumped directly from "crypto bank" to "Aave + Circle," with a valuation increase of 10x. After all, Trump wrote the Art of the Deal, and this kind of deal is absolutely disgraceful. Regarding the market considering WLFI's allocation as intrinsic value for Aave, that's purely one-sided speculation. Because neither party's proposal mentioned that WLFI would allocate to the Aave treasury; the main focus was on liquidity mining incentives, and Aave holders would not directly receive tokens. The script going forward is likely this: WLFI completely abandons Aave, thus rendering the previous contract void. A large-scale reduction in token distribution shares. The allocation will be used to incentivize the borrowing and minting of USD1, with no losses on either side, treating it as operational subsidies for targeted stablecoin minting.