On the real though, from a TA perspective this would be the best case scenario: A leading diagonal has 5 subwaves but unlike a traditional impulse they DO overlap and the subwaves are 3 legged, corrective structures. This makes these moves tricky to trust because they look corrective by default. Invalidation for this "best case" would be the original which is basically at our lows and right above the inefficiency, so the bottom is either in and the next leg up has begun (albeit in a non-traditional way), OR we will invalidate this idea and finally get a test of the inefficiency below. Let's see what we get 🍿 $CRV
We knew he would return one day...
Show original
98.43K
569
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.