Why is @anoma so popular? A comparative analysis with other projects. What are the similarities and differences between @anoma and other projects? Similar to Cosmos • Both use Tendermint consensus, with a deep technical lineage. • Both aim for "multi-chain interoperability" to solve the problem of information silos between chains. • The difference is: Anoma focuses more on "user intent"; for example, you just say, "I want to exchange A for B," and the system handles the rest. Cosmos, on the other hand, is more like a toolbox for developers to build with. Summary: Anoma can be seen as an enhanced version of Cosmos, with added privacy and a more user-friendly interaction. Similar to Ethereum • Both can run decentralized applications. • Both have their own concept of a "virtual machine" (Anoma is the Intent Machine, ETH is the EVM). • The difference is: Ethereum is operation-driven, requiring gas and multiple steps; whereas Anoma is "what do I want," allowing for automatic matching, providing a smoother experience. • In terms of privacy, Ethereum is transparent by default and requires plugins for privacy, while Anoma comes with "built-in privacy." Summary: Anoma is like a more user-friendly, privacy-focused version of Ethereum. Similar to Zcash • Both emphasize transaction privacy and use zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) technology. • Both have the concept of a "shielded pool" to hide assets. • The difference is: Zcash is primarily a privacy payment system; Anoma is a "privacy universal platform" that can do many things. Summary: Anoma not only hides money but also aims to help you perform more Web3 operations privately. Similar to Polkadot • Both emphasize multi-chain interoperability and have a modular structure. • Polkadot connects its ecosystem using a relay chain + parachains; Anoma coordinates multiple chains using its own intent system. • The difference is: Polkadot is more focused on building the technical underpinnings, with weaker privacy features; Anoma leans more towards user interaction design, with privacy as a standard. Summary: Polkadot is a translator between chains, while Anoma is an intelligent assistant that completes tasks for you when you speak up. Similar to Namada • Namada is actually a member of the Anoma family, focusing on privacy transfers. • Both share the same technology, using ZKP and multi-asset shielded pools. • The difference is: Namada focuses on "hiding assets"; Anoma is the "brain" that coordinates more complex needs. Summary: Namada is Anoma's "privacy wallet little brother," while Anoma is the "brain and operating system" of the entire system. In conclusion @anoma integrates Cosmos's cross-chain capabilities, Ethereum's smart contracts, Zcash's privacy, and Polkadot's modular design, all while having its own unique "intent-driven" system that allows users to operate on the blockchain as if they are "making wishes." The goal is to make using Web3 as simple and secure as using WeChat. So this should answer the question posed at the beginning of the article. It's just too competitive. Keep it up, brothers, and stay tuned. 👍