I know I'm going to get asked a lot -- how is $SNOW different from $PLTR? Snowflake is the data kitchen -- it preps & serves the ingredients. Palantir is the chef -- it turns those ingredients into decisions & actions the business actually uses. That's why they coexist.
$SNOW JUST MADE ITS BIGGEST MOVE YET TOWARD THE AI DATA PLANE Snowflake didn’t buy Crunchy Data because it needed another product. It bought it because the ground beneath the data economy is shifting -- and if Snowflake is going to remain a foundational layer of that economy, it needs to shift with it. For years, Snowflake dominated the world of analytical data -- the after-the-fact warehouse where information gets aggregated, queried, and modeled. That role was lucrative. But it was also increasingly boxed in. The center of gravity in enterprise data is moving -- away from static analytics and toward live, transactional, AI-fueled workflows that sit directly inside the applications where business gets done. That’s why Crunchy matters. Postgres isn’t just a database -- it’s the backbone of modern app development. It’s where transactions live, where operational state is maintained, where real-world business logic happens. And as AI moves from being an external add-on to an embedded capability inside those apps, control over this layer is strategic. Because if you control the operational data path, you don’t just support AI -- you shape it. This is the subtext behind every recent database land grab. Databricks buying Neon. $CRM buying Informatica. Snowflake buying Crunchy. These aren’t isolated moves -- they are signals that the AI data stack is collapsing. The era of one pipeline for analytics and another for apps is ending. The next generation of digital experiences -- AI agents inside business workflows, real-time personalization, autonomous decisioning -- will demand unified, AI-ready data infrastructure. Snowflake sees this clearly. If it remained just a warehouse, it would risk becoming a peripheral player -- useful for retrospective analysis, but invisible to the live operations where AI value is actually created. By owning enterprise-grade Postgres and bringing it under the Snowflake Data Cloud umbrella, Snowflake is repositioning itself as connective tissue -- not between BI dashboards and data lakes, but between operational transactions, AI systems, and business outcomes. And this is why it matters more than the $250M headline number suggests. The new digital economy will not be powered by monolithic AI models alone. It will be powered by millions of small, embedded, context-aware AI agents operating inside the flow of business. Sales workflows, financial systems, logistics platforms, consumer apps -- all of them increasingly mediated by AI that needs fast, transactional, governed access to operational data. The player who provides that unified substrate will control disproportionate enterprise value. Snowflake is now making an explicit bid to be that player. Not just an analytical backend, but the layer where operational state and AI intelligence merge. A trusted, performant, secure path to collapse the stack -- from raw data to live decisioning -- inside the enterprise. And that is a fundamentally different business than the one Snowflake went public with. But it’s the right move. Because the nature of AI demand is changing. Model innovation will commoditize. Data quality and architecture will determine differentiation. The winners will be the platforms that can make the right data available to the right model in the right moment -- with guarantees around compliance, scale, and latency. This is why the acquisition is so strategically loaded. It’s not just about Postgres -- it’s about winning developer mindshare at the operational layer. About expanding Snowflake’s surface area into live application workloads. About positioning Snowflake not merely as a data lake, but as an AI-native data operating system for the enterprise. At @FuturumEquities, we believe the platforms that collapse operational and analytical data into an AI-native data plane will own the next decade of enterprise value creation. And this is why the market barely nudged when the announcement was made. Because this is not a revenue-accretive bolt-on. It’s a foundation move -- one that will take years to fully monetize but that is essential to long-term relevance. The players who fail to build this connective layer will be stuck competing on model access and LLM fine-tuning, which is already a margin race to the bottom. The ones who succeed will become the indispensable infrastructure behind intelligent business operations -- the layer no enterprise can rip out. In that sense, what Snowflake just signaled is not about catching up to Databricks or responding to Postgres trends. It is about reshaping its role in a world where data, AI, and business execution are no longer separate concerns. They are fused. And the platform that can fuse them cleanly, scalably, and securely becomes the substrate of the new digital economy.
Show original
63.94K
251
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.