挺逗的,反驳记者写的不准确,是「恶意中伤」,给出来的解释是: 因为 Brevan Howard 的投资主体是一个仅投资流动性的新基金,所以,为了符合这个投资主体流动性策略的投资标准,所以双方搞了附属协议。在这个附属协议中,承诺了额外的商业安排(也就是所谓的退款条款)。 按照 Berachain 的说法,这个条款是为了「防备Berachain未能完成 TGE 和不能上市的情况」(注意这是重点!)设定的。 但是不对啊,如果贴出来的退款条款是真的,这个条款上清清楚楚明明白白写的是,Brevan Howard 的投资主体在 「TGE 之后」的一年内有权提出退款要求啊。既然协议条款都明确说的是,退款权利在「TGE 之后」了,也就是完成了 TGE 还可以退款,和官方上面划重点的解释不符吧? 所以谁在撒谎? 另外,如果想反驳这个记者写的不对,似乎最有力的反驳应该是:贴出来的协议是伪造的,或者是假的。。 (见过不要脸的,没见过这么不要脸的)
1.38K
4
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.