Dear @NetworkNoya Recently, I've been looking at NOYA, especially the "AI Oracle" system, a reliable data laborer + guardian dual system. Relying solely on the on-chain "low-quality data" is simply not enough; AI isn't just making decisions on a whim anymore. What it needs is real-time, multi-chain, multi-dimensional, and verifiable "hardcore data breakfast." NOYA is not satisfied with just throwing data to AI and calling it a day; it has implemented a "verification mechanism": ✅ Data is first uploaded to IPFS, where anyone can check it and report issues. ✅ There is a 10-minute "observation period"; if you notice something off, you can submit a fraud proof, and the system will immediately halt updates! ✅ Watchers are on duty the whole time, monitoring the data in real-time, and if anything suspicious arises, they will intercept it immediately. NOYA is not just about "supplying data"; it also mandates that AI strategists using this data must make the model results public. Who used NOYA's data, how it was used, and whether the results are reliable can all be traced.