Why do some collections want to be the face of Ronin? If you're too dependent on the chain network and can't build your own identity and brand on it, that will be so hard for the community to grow. Pudgy became the mascot of Abstract because they own Abstract; they built their own brand and ecosystem on it. I think collections should grow and nurture their own brand identity. Not saying you should build your own chain network, you can grow by building other tech platforms and brand ecosystems. What we're expecting from @Ronin_Network is to build a strong foundational ecosystem and user experience on it. We're not worried if they are not focused on us on the MARKETING and BRAND side because we can handle that ourselves. We don't want to blame the chain network if our floor price is down or if we cannot onboard users on PFPs. That's our responsibility as a team/founder, not the responsibility of @nixeniego, @Jihoz_Axie, or any other @SkyMavisHQ member. We go on Ronin network because we need their tech, and the value we can provide to this ecosystem is helping them introduce their technology on the Web2 side and grow our community. That's fair and healthy mutual benefits... nothing should be beyond expectations.

There's no need to pressure Ronin if you see them supporting others. All marketing and growth remain the responsibility of our/your team. We're happy and truly grateful for any support the Ronin team provides, especially during the minting phase. If you're a new project and feel like you're not getting support from the Ronin network, maybe you should start by asking yourself why you want to build a project in the first place.