It is important to set out our intention with @jup_studio. I have been discussing Studio with @9yointern, @weremeow and team all week. Thank you all for your feedback. Firstly, Studio is built for creators, concepts and communities which are interesting and enduring. We are specifically not building for industrial token style launches, for which there are many other incredible venues. Secondly, we intend to fully support tokens which have strong communities, interesting use cases and enduring founders. Finally, Studio itself may be an experiment in meta-shifting, but is fully supported by @JupiterExchange. It is here to stay. We are cognizant of the feedback from creators, traders and the community. Firstly, the perhaps loudest feedback is around the perception of mixed messaging coming from the @jup_studio account, and the general 'confusing' signaling from the Jupiter team. Secondly, there is creator and community feedback relating to product-related features, such as demand for CTO-supporting features and airdrop / burn features. Thirdly, there are questions around graduation market caps, starting liquidity and optimal settings. Will first address the elephant in the room - the perceived mixed messaging which has affected traders confidence and volumes, which could potentially spillover into creators experiences. We have set out our intention for Studio above, and we intend to clearly champion and signal our support for tokens with strong communities and interesting use cases, with a particular focus on long-term committed founders and projects. We are also aware of the need to attract and retain traders' interest. This is something we will actively develop and grow over time. The various levers for supporting and growing the ecosystem will be clearly communicated in the coming days and as the Studio ecosystem develops. Secondly, we are in the process of developing a CTO function, as well as other functions to facilitate community building and project management. We will continue developing this according to feedback. Finally, we are actively monitoring and adjusting default settings to ensure tokens graduate with sufficient liquidity. Feel free to reach out to @9yointern or myself if you are intending to launch a project on Studio and have any questions. We also welcome any new creators, particularly those with interesting concepts and enduring communities. We are actively tracking projects on Studio, and I personally find the following projects to be of interest.

1/ Uranus is a pretty funny meme (and apt for Jupiter Studio), and it looks like a reasonably organic community @Uranus_jup has developed around it, even if such community has largely rallied around spamming my DMs that I 'need to support the runner'. Uranus looks good tho.

4/ in terms of use cases, I'm personally amused by @MacroStrategyFi as a satire of @MicroStrategy. Honestly with the right financial engineering, anything is possible. Saylor basically memed the Microstrategy premium into existence. The DeFi thing is also... cool if it happens.

5/ In terms of smol mcap projects, I am also inspired by @TondoXXII's project Steve. One of the cool things about Studio is the ability for creators to fund things they care about, and seeing a whole game spawn from speculative capital is cool. Hope the game gets developed.

6/ Another small market cap token - we would generally encourage less overwhelmingly Jup-centric projects but @Marchisko's energy with @BurningJup is incredible, and the headway he has made is impressive. Also greatly appreciate his feedback on the Studio product.

7/ There are a few more small market cap projects I am following with great interest, but I can talk about those another time.