Let me quickly recap what just happened: $10waz2 Hxxmg1atgaEW6zPFLikiR8n923HzE3oX8KafsHKPrqH3 A dual narrative was constructed around the ethical controversy of experimental cats. 10waz2 is the name of the lab. Think about it—if the lab is already abusing cats, would they even bother to give it a proper name? So in the end, I bet on the "Code Cat." Artemis represents the real name of the cat, which is actually another orange cat. The community split into "Experiment Faction" and "Animal Faction." Regarding the experimental cat, Musk replied that Doge would investigate animal abuse, which caused both cats to surge to around 3M. Code Cat 10waz2: I first discovered it at 240k. Name Cat Artemis: I entered at 22. Both achieved about 5x returns. Apologies for being on the phone constantly; I only had time to share this in the small group. This is why you need to stay active in the main group so I can pull you into the small group. To be honest, why can the small group plan ahead? Because the main group has too many people, and there’s no time to explain to everyone individually. Time is money, and a moment of hesitation could mean a difference of hundreds of thousands. This incident once again proves that information asymmetry is the greatest alpha. The key point is that the community split into the Experiment Faction and the Animal Faction, with funds pulling against each other. Without this division, a unilateral trend might have directly surged to 10M. But that’s the market—it’s always testing your judgment. Here’s a recap of my thought process for your reference: The operation path was straightforward: 1. First, heavily invest in Code Cat to achieve a 10x return. 2. During the pullback, notice Artemis gaining traction and reduce Code Cat holdings to chase it. 3. Observe Ansem entering the market and pushing Artemis higher. 4. At 500k for Code Cat, I fully realized: real experimental cats would only be named with code. 5. Went all-in back to 10waz2 and exited at 3M.