The court accepting this argument would be truly catastrophic to freedom
Incredible revelation by the SDNY in its response to @rstormsf. Apparently, users don’t execute their own transactions whatsoever; instead, they assert that the Tornado Cash UI itself conducts the transaction and the user’s wallet is merely a tool for it to do so. In other words, according to the SDNY, the UI is sentient and users are instruments of its doings. Folks, we’ve reached AGI. This completely ignores the reality that users control their own assets and execute their own transactions with their private key. And worse, it was confidently submitted to an American court room in opposition to a man’s freedom. So after years of preparing for this case—including studying for trial, listening to hours of testimony, and questioning experts—this is the best the SDNY has to offer. Either the SDNY doesn’t get it or is intentionally misunderstanding the facts.
502
1
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。