尤可欣

web3

1Following

187followers

Feed

A stock rose 9% when all exchanges worldwide were closed. Does it really count as a rise? This sounds like a philosophical question. But on July 30, it became a verifiable fact. About 6 hours before the US stock market opened, from UTC 07:00 to 12:00: SNDK rose 9.3% SKHYNIX rose 8.5% SKHY rose 10.3% One is a US stock, one is a Korean stock, and one is an ADR. Three completely different trading venues started simultaneously within the same window. Then the US market opened, and the market further confirmed the trend. Let's clarify why this is extraordinary. In finance, there is a classic finding cited for forty years. French and Roll conducted a study in 1986 comparing stock price variance during market open and close periods. The conclusion was that volatility during open hours is much higher than during closed hours. The explanation at the time was that trading activity itself creates volatility. But that study had an unavoidable premise. When the market is closed, you simply have no price series to measure. The low volatility you observe is not market calmness; it is the absence of instruments recording data. This is the true source of price gaps. We say the market gaps up 8% on Monday open, as if the price slept over the weekend and suddenly jumped upon waking. It did not jump. It moved continuously during those two days, but no venue allowed you to see or execute trades. A gap is not a price action; it is an observation breakpoint. So the question arises: What happens if a market continues operating during the traditional market's closed hours? Hasbrouck provided a set of tools in 1995. When the same asset trades on multiple venues, you can measure each venue's contribution to the final price. He called this the information share. This framework was originally used to compare the NYSE and NASDAQ. Now it has a more interesting application scenario: When traditional markets are closed, and only one market remains open, what is that market's information share during that period? The six hours on July 30 gave a directional answer. What further illustrates the issue is that this is not an isolated case. Look at Binance TradFi structural data. Top five storage-related stocks SNDK, SKHYNIX, SOXL, MU, SKHY had weekly trading volume of $73.3 billion, accounting for 57% of TradFi weekly volume. Among them, SNDK alone accounted for $24.4 billion, 19% of the entire week. And 51% of the volume for these five stocks occurred during the underlying market's closed hours. The off-exchange proportion for US stock-related assets is 49% to 66%. For Korean stocks, 48% to 49%. For SKHY, the ADR, 60%. Off-exchange is not just an extended session; it has become the main battlefield. Why storage specifically? Because this industry chain physically spans time zones. Upstream capacity is in Korea; demand and pricing power are in the US, with ADRs and ETFs in between. When an earnings report comes out, it must be transmitted back and forth between Seoul and New York. Traditional markets have segmented this chain into disconnected time periods. Seoul closes while New York hasn't opened yet. New York closes while Seoul is asleep again. What 7×24 trading does is reconnect these segments into a single timeline. The liquidity scale has also reached significant levels. From July 24 to 30, Binance TradFi perpetual weekly volume was $129.5 billion. On July 29 alone, $35.6 billion, 47% higher than the previous peak. The top five single-day volumes in history all occurred in July 2026. Under the Top 5 CEX metric, Binance accounts for 69%, 3.8 times the second place. This is not a pulse; it is a continuous peak elevation. Price discovery requires depth; off-exchange prices without depth are just noise. These numbers indicate that the capacity to absorb information is already in place. On another front, Binance Research conducted a study. To clarify, bStocks are tokenized stocks, and TradFi perpetuals are two different products with separate metrics and cannot be mixed. But they point to the same structural change. As of July 28, $1.5 billion of bStocks traded on Binance during US stock market closed hours. In the past seven days, 59% of Binance volume and 92% of on-chain volume occurred outside US stock trading hours. The sharpest figure in this study is this: Over the past seven weekends, the median pricing ratio of bStocks to the subsequent Monday open gap was 92%. In plain language: That gap you thought only happened Monday morning was 90% priced over the weekend. Returning to French and Roll's conclusion from forty years ago: Low volatility during closed hours may never have been due to market calmness. It was because we covered our ears and then said the world was noisy. But let's not overstate it; this is still early stage. bStocks market cap just passed $500 million, accounting for 27% of global tokenized stock market cap. On-chain volume in July was about $7.4 billion, 85% of tokenized stock DEX volume that month. Sounds impressive, but its volume is still only 0.3% of underlying stocks and ETF volume. High growth and extremely low penetration coexist. The meaning is clear: traditional markets have not been replaced; a 24/7 stock market is just beginning to grow. What matters is not the current scale but the migration slope. And one more thing must be said upfront: Leading the reflection does not equal being necessarily correct. Off-exchange forms a reference price, not a commitment. It may be confirmed or overturned by the subsequent open. 7×24 trading expands your freedom to choose time, not a definitive result. Finally, something I've thought about for a long time: We call the first trade of the day the opening price. This term is actually misleading. The opening price is never the first price of the day. It is just the first price allowed to be seen. That bell has been ringing since 1817. It used to signal the start of pricing. Now it increasingly sounds like confirmation. - Data source: Binance Research "Stock Price Discovery Moves On-Chain" July 29, 2026 @binancezh #币安 #TradFi #bStocks