TEE security discussion heating up:
@zama showing Battering RAM/WireTap exploits on Intel SGX (~$50 hardware cost for memory aliasing attacks)
Meanwhile, 4 new TEE implementations launched this week: 🧵

• @tenprotocol: 500M+ testnet transactions in SGX/TDX
• @oasisprotocol ROFL: Off-chain compute in Intel TDX
• @zk_agi: SGX/SEV for federated training
• Cap's AVS: Certora audit complete (no critical issues)
The debate: Math-based proofs (FHE, ZK) vs. hardware trust (TEE enclaves)
@Gaianet_AI AVS approach: Cryptoeconomic validation layer
✅Not choosing between TEE and proofs
✅Economic slashing for incorrect verification
✅Works with any compute substrate

Built on @eigenlayer restaking. Validator set securing inference quality through staked capital, not just attestations.
Live with real validation data. Not picking sides in FHE vs. TEE - we're adding economic accountability to both.
1.75K
23
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.

