Recently, the collapse of ZKJ and KOGE has sounded the alarm for the market—liquidity mining and Alpha strategies are not risk-free arbitrage; choosing the wrong targets can lead to significant capital loss. The reasons for the collapse of these projects are varied, including **lack of real business support, design flaws in liquidity pools, and malicious cashing out by the team**, ultimately resulting in LP losses, contract liquidations, and spot prices dropping to zero. This series of events has led the market to re-examine the core of Alpha strategies: **not all projects are suitable for volume manipulation; the choice of targets is more important than the strategy itself.** ### Why is MYX a better choice in the current market environment? #### 1. Project fundamentals: real business support, not pure speculative hype Unlike the collapsed projects, MYX does not rely on market sentiment or short-term narratives; it has actual products in place and occupies a certain market share in its niche. This means its token has **long-term value capture capability**, rather than solely relying on liquidity mining to maintain its price. #### 2. Liquidity pool depth matches market cap, strong resistance to shocks Many collapsed projects share the common characteristics of **shallow pools and inflated market caps**, leading to severe volatility from minor capital inflows and outflows, even being maliciously manipulated. MYX's pool depth is relatively substantial at its current market cap, resulting in **lower slippage losses** during volume manipulation, while also reducing the risk of large holders dumping. #### 3. Low measured wear, suitable for long-term strategy execution After multiple rounds of testing, MYX's **capital wear rate during volume manipulation is significantly lower than similar projects**, meaning lower execution costs for strategies and greater sustainability in the long run. In contrast, many high APR projects may seem attractive in terms of returns, but in reality, they could lead to losses due to pool instability or token depreciation after volume manipulation. #### 4. Market environment comparison: MYX's differentiated advantages After the collapse of similar projects like ZKJ/KOGE, the market's trust in high-yield Alpha strategies has declined, and investors are more inclined to choose **low-risk, verifiable targets with real business support**. MYX perfectly aligns with this trend—**it does not rely on short-term speculation but provides a more stable strategy execution environment through product and liquidity design.** ### Conclusion: The future of Alpha strategies—returning to fundamentals, choosing sustainable targets The lessons from ZKJ/KOGE indicate that **high returns inevitably come with high risks, especially in projects lacking real value**. In the current market environment, investors should focus more on the project's **business feasibility, liquidity health, and team background**, rather than blindly chasing short-term APR. MYX's advantages include: ✅ Real business support, not just a pure money game ✅ Pool depth matches market cap, reducing price manipulation risk ✅ Low measured wear, controllable strategy execution costs ✅ Maintains stability during market panic, strong risk resistance For investors looking to execute Alpha strategies long-term, **choosing targets like MYX may be more sustainable than betting on high volatility, high-risk "hot projects."** The market will eventually return to rationality, and only projects with true value capture capabilities can become robust choices for Alpha strategies. Observe MYX's stability before making decisions.