If we want founders and teams to prioritize long term thinking for products and tokenholders we need the incentives to change.
The reality is many protocols view the cost of capital of tokens to be $0. So they do shortsighted things with them and their investors don't hold them accountable for it, and in many cases even encourage it.
I don't see a reason for this to change without incentives for that to occur. The lowest hanging fruit is to do what @arbitrum did on Day 1. Have the community treasury be governed onchain by tokenholders. This makes the community aware of large initiatives and involves a lot more transparency in the system.
Just to understand the scale of the news today, the Move MM deal was 5% of the token supply. The Arbitrum Foundation vests 7.5% of the token supply over four years.
Show original
3.37K
0
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.