Aptos finally bowed his head and admitted defeat, but the proud head still refused to fall to the ground - Abundance I just walked out of Tibet, and when I saw this article, I couldn't help but say a few more words. Original: In an interview with Foresight News @Foresight_News, Aptos @Aptos officially admitted for the first time on a positive note: 1. Insufficient marketing 2. The adoption rate of retail investors is low 3. The level of ecological developers cannot keep up 4. Weak community consensus These things that have been complained about by the community in the past year, they are finally willing to say it themselves: APTOS has no wealth effect! But do you think it's a confession? No, it's more like using an engineer's background as a shield, and lightly portraying the problem as "we're too good to make it clear" 🙃 In essence, they still feel that they are the most tech-savvy and cutting-edge, but "the masses don't know how to appreciate". After reading it, my summary: clichés, tactical backwards The interview was full of a lot of (nice empty words) Creating a "Global Trading Engine" Support transaction size expansion Introduce cross-chain accounts Help ecosystem developers $200 million ecological incentive plan … A bunch of seemingly loud neologisms It sounds grandiose, but every one falls to the ground, and there is still no explanation: 👉 Where is the true unique value of Aptos itself? 👉 Why should users come now instead of continuing to use EVM/Solana? 👉 After the developer comes, can you get not only money, but real needs? 👉 Why do retail investors support you, and those who once supported you have become cannon fodder, right? The problem is admitted, but the action still maintains the common problem of engineers with arrogance: they like to talk about the future blueprint, and they hate to face the current users. What Feng Mi wants to say: First of all, I must affirm that APTOS, as the star of the MOVE system, has a really good foundation and has done a lot of work, such as the deployment of the native USDT USDC, and the lowest rewithdrawal fees on the exchange. I personally participated in many Defi protocols in the ecosystem, digging subsidies and all kinds of commotion, and I was the first to shout emoji 🐶180 times a day, but the official operation really disagreed. The real problem seems to me to be: aptos it's always on top, the team doesn't understand WEB3, I don't understand the community, I don't understand the users, I don't know the system, and there is no rule in the operation! A large number of benefits cannot be inherited in the currency price and ecology! What users want is a chain that can be played, not how much TPS there is, but a wealth effect! We and other retail investors want the opportunity to "make money", not a new narrative packaged in a stack of words. Developers want a chain with "real users", and APTOS has given a lot of incentives to project parties in the past, such as Amnis in the screenshot being named by Fengmi, Amnis is a garbage fighter project in the apots ecosystem, and the specific use of the machine can be the word chicken 🐔. You tell me? aptos officially gave a large number of tokens to this project party for marketing, becoming one of the 4 projects of LFM, and finally abandoned most of the users when the official guidance of its TGE, on the one hand, it shows that Vietnam is not good, and on the other hand, it shows that aptos is not able to support its ecological native protocol to come out, why, because the team is not good! The team doesn't understand! No, I said it wrong, in fact, I understand, and the official understands that everyone is afraid that everyone will sell the tokens and form selling pressure. You can see from the speech of this engineer that after the project token was launched, it performed excellently, became a well-known exchange (just pay for it), and the attitude of the community has changed (which eye has you seen the change, 99% of users have been killed, and the rise and fall of the currency price has nothing to do with retail investors) ⚠️Aptos still lives in its own "technical superiority", and is unwilling to really enter the language system of the community, users, and developers. It's like a master who has won a paradoxical literary award, selling poop on the street, but he has to use words to explain the good or bad taste. Acknowledging problems is the beginning of growth, and admitting mistakes is not good to be down-to-earth? In this way, the day when 1 Sui is greater than 1 APT will come soon! Interests, holding APT, FUD holding your own position, should be the most stupid behavior, say something unpleasant, let the project party block me, make the official staff uncomfortable, adults pay for their choices, but, To tell the truth, it's actually quite hard! Tell the truth not because you hate, but because you still care. Oops,, don't drink some wine, talk too much. I rub