all the homies don't support EOF
My vote is against including EOF in Fusaka.
As we’re building a zkEVM tech stack for Ethereum, we will always maintain compatibility with the L1, and will be directly impacted by this decision. The L1 roadmap is our roadmap.
In my experience, committing a high-cost feature to delivery with unconvincing value never leads to a good outcome. I haven’t seen (yet) sufficient user research data on how this will help Ethereum, Linea, ENS Namechain, Status Network, and the other Ethereum L2 rollups I’m talking to reach their business objectives, eg increase quality demand for blockspace.
I’d like to see Fusaka scope kept to solve the most painful and pressing problems for Ethereum’s users (eg increasing blobs) that we have >70% confidence in, and continue to do product discovery on solutions like EOF. If it truly solves a painful problem, the solution/feature always finds a way of making it back into the roadmap, with a sense of inevitability. We’re not there yet imo.
@TimBeiko @adietrichs @tkstanczak
3.28K
1
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.