How do I post in #ETHGlamsterdamCountdown?

When creating a post on OKX Orbit, type # in the editor and select ETHGlamsterdamCountdown from the dropdown to tag your post with this topic.

What crypto assets are related to ETHGlamsterdamCountdown?

ETHGlamsterdamCountdown is associated with ETH. You can view real-time price data and market insights for these assets directly on this page.

#ETHGlamsterdamCountdown

Q: What is ETHGlamsterdamCountdown?

ETHGlamsterdamCountdown is Ethereum's major Glamsterdam upgrade is expected to land in June. Key changes: gas limit phased from 60M to 200M, TPS target of 10,000 (roughly 10x current), gas fees reduced by 78.6%, and ePBS to decentralize block building. ETH spot ETFs saw single-day net inflows above $100M in early May, with BlackRock's ETHA and Fidelity's FETH contributing over 90% of the total.. Follow this topic on OKX Orbit for the latest community posts and token insights.

About ETHGlamsterdamCountdown

Ethereum's major Glamsterdam upgrade is expected to land in June. Key changes: gas limit phased from 60M to 200M, TPS target of 10,000 (roughly 10x current), gas fees reduced by 78.6%, and ePBS to decentralize block building. ETH spot ETFs saw single-day net inflows above $100M in early May, with BlackRock's ETHA and Fidelity's FETH contributing over 90% of the total.

Related crypto

ETH

+0.53%

Hot

Latest

ETHGlamsterdamCountdown Popular posts

Ethereum price volatility mainly comes from the combined effects of six major factors: macroeconomics, supply and demand, technical ecosystem, capital leverage, policies, and Bitcoin correlation. 1. Macroeconomics (driving the big trend) • Interest rates and liquidity Interest rate hike cycle → capital flees high-risk assets (crypto, US stocks) → ETH plunges Expectations of rate cuts → liquidity easing → risk assets rebound • Inflation and economic data High inflation → rate hike expectations → bearish; recession expectations → risk aversion → bearish • Geopolitics and USD strength Rising risk aversion → capital outflow from crypto → decline 2. Supply and demand structure (long-term fundamentals) • PoS staking lock-up Large amount of ETH staked (about 30%) → reduced circulation → price support Unlocking/withdrawal wave → increased selling pressure → decline • Deflation mechanism (EIP-1559) Active on-chain activity, high Gas fees → more burning → deflation → bullish Low on-chain activity → less burning → inflation pressure → bearish • Whale actions Large transfers into exchanges → expected sell-off → drop Large cold wallet accumulation → bullish → rise 3. Technology and ecosystem (intrinsic value) • Network upgrades (Cancun, Pectra, Glamsterdam) Expectation phase → price rise (buying the expectation) After implementation → often price drop (selling the fact) • Layer2, DeFi, NFT, GameFi popularity Booming ecosystem, rising TVL → strong demand → rise Low on-chain activity, declining DEX volume → drop • Public chain competition Rise of low Gas, high TPS chains like Solana → capital and user diversion → suppress ETH 4. Capital and leverage (main cause of short-term surges and crashes) • ETF capital flows Large inflows into spot ETH ETFs → rise; outflows → fall • Leverage and liquidations (volatility amplifier) Price rise → short squeeze → further rise Price fall → long liquidations → cascading long liquidations → accelerated crash • Contract positions, funding rates, stablecoin supply High positions + high leverage → prone to sharp corrections 5. Policies and regulations (black swans) • Clear regulation (e.g., ETF approval) → bullish • Tightening regulation, crackdown on staking/DeFi → panic sell-off • Inconsistent policies across countries → ongoing uncertainty 6. Bitcoin correlation (sentiment and market) • ETH mostly follows BTC BTC surges → drives entire market → ETH rises BTC crashes → panic spreads → ETH falls more (high beta) In summary Long-term focus on macro + ecosystem supply and demand, mid-term on upgrades and capital, short-term on leverage + whales + news. $ETH $BTC #OKX星球话题来啦

ETHUSDTperpetual100xSellOpen position

Trade

Floating PnL

+4.42%

Average sub-order price2,327.27Mark price2,326.20

May 14th: A Decisive Moment? Key Bill Vote, Ethereum Epic Upgrade, Bitcoin Ignores Rate Hikes After a "rollercoaster" market, Bitcoin has stabilized above $81,000, with its total market cap rebounding nearly $4 billion from recent lows. More importantly, a series of macro and ecosystem catalysts are converging in the same time window. Macro Headwinds? Bitcoin Is "Unbothered" The Federal Reserve kept rates steady at 3.50%-3.75%, but dissenting votes hit the highest level since 1992. Employment data surprised on the upside, pushing the probability of a rate hike to 20.8%. Market expectations shifted sharply from "two rate cuts" to "no change or even hikes." However, Bitcoin is almost immune to this, with analysts believing that the established inflation hedge narrative combined with continued ETF net inflows has built a solid price floor. The Most Critical Battle: Senate Vote on May 14 The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" is under Senate review, with the probability of passage rising to about 60%. The three core points are: defining SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, clarifying whether tokens are securities or commodities; a stablecoin compromise allowing earnings from transactions but banning passive reserve interest; Coinbase returning to the support camp, Galaxy Digital's CEO estimating a 70% chance of passage and predicting BTC will surge to $100,000 once it breaks $84,000. On Polymarket, the probability of passage within this year has risen to 65%. This is no longer just an "industry positive"—it is the countdown switch for institutional capital entry. Ethereum's Epic Scaling: Gas Limit Tripled The Glamsterdam upgrade raises the Gas limit from 60 million to 200 million, marking the largest expansion in history, with Rollup fees estimated to drop by about 70%. For DeFi and cross-chain applications, this is a fundamental infrastructure reshaping. Solana: Developer Share Soars from 6% to 23% Western Digital issued the stablecoin USDPT on Solana, and Jito partnered with Solana Company for institutional staking cooperation across four Asia-Pacific locations. Even more striking at the developer level: Solana's share of blockchain developers rose from 6% in 2020 to 23%, while Ethereum's dropped from 82% to 31%. In 2025, Solana is expected to add 4,100 new developers, surpassing Ethereum's 3,700; Q1 transaction volume was 125 times that of Ethereum. SOL is currently priced around $89, far from its all-time high, but growth on both institutional and developer fronts is clear, with volatility expected to be intense. AI + Web3 Narrative Fully Explodes OKX launched the Agentic Wallet trading competition, allowing users to complete research, execution, and tracking across the entire chain via conversational AI. Arthur Hayes bluntly stated at the Consensus conference that "99% of altcoins will eventually go to zero," advising focus only on Bitcoin and projects with strong communities and applications. Macro, legislation, tech upgrades, developer migration, AI narrative—five threads are tightening simultaneously. Bitcoin at $84,000 is a watershed moment, and the May 14 vote could be the crossing point. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #CLARITY法案：标记审议最早下周启动 $ZEC $CORE $LAB

Ethereum's June Glamsterdam upgrade will raise the Gas limit from 60 million directly to 200 million, cutting Gas fees by 78% and pushing TPS to 10,000. The whole network is shouting that Ethereum is about to take off. Right. But let me tell you, that's not the main point. What I want to talk about today is darker, more painful, and more explosive. If all you see are Gas fees and TPS, then you're still the chump waiting to be harvested. The real target of this upgrade is the MEV trillion-dollar cake. Who laughs, who cries, and who gets kicked off the table? A bloody reshuffle of interests is about to happen. What can you "freeload" this time? Let's start with the good news, so I don't sound too bleak. After June, when you make a transfer on the mainnet, the fee will plummet—Ethereum Foundation's estimate for EIP-8007 shows an average cost reduction of 78.6%. Single transfers that used to be unaffordable now cost just a few dimes, and even complex smart contract calls become ridiculously cheap. TPS will soar from a few hundred to 10,000, so you no longer have to pay multiple times the miner fee premium. Previously, when you played DeFi, just staking could cost you tens of dollars in Gas fees. In the future, it'll be fifty cents per transaction. If you envied Solana's low fees and thought "ETH chain is too expensive for me," after June, Ethereum will transform its L1 into a twelve-lane superhighway—this is the real enterprise-grade experience. But don't get too happy too soon. Saving money is just the smallest price. The real drama is playing out where you can't see. ePBS = MEV "legal harvesting"? Who's really the bagholder? The core EIP-7732 of this upgrade is called "embedded proposer-builder separation" (ePBS). Simply put: it moves the previously "black-box" block construction process out into the open protocol. How was it done before? Builders packaged high-profit blocks and sent them to validators via relays like Flashbots, and validators just produced blocks to collect fees. This model fattened a group of people but had big problems: you had to trust the relays not to act maliciously, and builders became increasingly centralized. ePBS aims to completely eliminate relays; builders directly send blocks to validators with cryptographic commitments, and validators only accept the highest bids. Sounds "fair," right? Here's the problem. Some have calculated: a 2026 paper using the Gini coefficient shows that under ePBS, the Gini coefficient of builder profits jumps from 0.17 to 0.84, meaning 95% of block value flows to proposers, and builders have almost no say. Who wins? Large staked capital—they don't need building skills, just hardware plus stake, waiting for others to hand over high-profit blocks for free, profiting passively. Who loses? Ordinary stakers' MEV income becomes more uncertain, and the "middle class" among old holders is squeezed to the margins. Who suffers most? Individual builders and arbitrageurs running complex MEV strategies are directly swept off the field by ePBS. You think only retail investors are out? Too naive. The real hunting target is the handful of players in the builder market. The dragon slayer becomes the dragon? Flashbots "officially" eliminated If you know MEV, you've definitely heard of Flashbots. In recent years, MEV-Boost and Relay on Ethereum have handled over 75% of blocks. Flashbots built the MEV ecosystem, becoming the "most MEV-savvy" beneficiaries through technical depth and market share. ePBS's core goal is to "remove dependence on Flashbots and other relays." A relay market worth hundreds of millions of dollars is about to be eliminated by the protocol. Will Flashbots accept this? They are frantically developing new mechanisms like Execution Tickets and MEV-Share. But no matter what, the tide has turned. Once ePBS takes effect, builders can only play this game through the protocol; the relay path depends on fate. This is the real turning point: players who used protocol "loopholes" to make big money are now locked inside the protocol cage. They compete within the protocol, but the rules are rewritten by ePBS. Chilling to think about: if you're a big capital player, you don't care about ePBS or not—you hire the best builders to ensure you get the most valuable block construction rights. But if you're a mid-sized MEV studio relying on relay rules and transaction ordering details to make a living—sorry, you're dead in this era. Resources are polarizing; the "middle class" of Ethereum staking ecology is about to collapse. That said, is ePBS really all bad? Vitalik is still promoting Execution Tickets—auctioning block construction rights with all revenue burned, benefiting all ETH holders. But that's a long-term plan. This Glamsterdam ePBS is just the first step. Whether the future is an idealistic decentralized utopia or a scenario where a few big capitals monopolize resources and harvest everyone—no one can guarantee that now. $BTC $ETH $SOL #ETH网络升级倒计时

Many people are cheering for the 78% drop in Gas fees, feeling that playing on-chain will finally be painless. I'm not so optimistic because the ETH I hold might see its most valuable story in recent years dismantled by this upgrade. Why did everyone once value ETH so highly and give it such a high valuation? Because of EIP-1559, which burns fees, making the total supply even deflationary—more robust than Bitcoin. This "ultrasonic currency" label is almost half the soul of its valuation. #ETH网络升级倒计时 But the reality? Since everyone got used to playing on layer 2, the ETH burned daily on the mainnet has dropped from $30 million to a pitiful $500,000. After the Merge, you might think it's deflationary? In fact, the total supply has been quietly increasing, with an annual inflation of 0.2%. With Glamsterdam landing, fees are cheaper, but the amount burned is definitely less. Unless a super popular app suddenly clogs the mainnet, the amount issued by PoS node staking will quickly surpass the amount burned, turning the "deflationary miracle coin" back into an "ordinary inflationary coin." Just thinking about how the market will revalue it keeps me up at night. And to those who keep watching ETF data shouting "institutions are rushing in to buy for me," I really want to pour cold water on that. The big players' calculations are about to hit me in the face. On the surface, net inflows of tens of millions in a single day look like a rush to accumulate. But I specifically talked to some old friends who are market makers, and their feedback is that many traditional institutions buying ETH don't have as much faith as you think. They simply treat Ethereum as a high-beta version of Bitcoin to allocate—when Bitcoin rises, they buy some ETH to amplify gains; when Bitcoin looks like it will fall, ETH is the first to be dumped. This money comes fast and goes faster, like a mudslide, not smart long-term money coming for the Glamsterdam tech revolution. To know if institutions really believe in this upgrade, just looking at inflows these days is useless; we have to wait until the testnet launch. If at that time ETFs keep buying aggressively for several days regardless of Bitcoin's mood, then institutions are truly voting with their feet, and that would be a signal we can somewhat trust. Honestly, the above is still about money, but what worries me most is that this upgrade is about to shake up too many people's cakes—a battle for "family division" inside Ethereum is about to start. ePBS, to put it simply, is about taking the middleman role of Flashbots and putting it on the protocol's public table to share. Flashbots used to make tens of millions of dollars in profits per quarter from MEV relays, living comfortably. Now the code is written into the base layer, and their role instantly becomes dispensable. Do you think they will just sit and wait to die? These clever folks have secretly set up BuilderNet to try a new track. But no matter how they struggle, the core monopoly profits will be squeezed out—this is a silent transfer of interests. Even worse than these giants are the small retail validators quietly running at home. Previously, connecting to Flashbots' MEV-Boost, if lucky to catch a "sandwich attack" big payoff, one block could equal months of usual earnings. With Glamsterdam, on the surface, everyone competes fairly, but block building ultimately depends on who can get top-tier order flow, which decentralized code can't solve—it still relies on connections and capital. Now the top builders like Beaverbuild can chew up 40% of blocks alone, and the top five take 80%, holding a very stable position. The code lowers the entry barrier, but real power remains concentrated in very few hands. I'm worried that once the middleman is removed and MEV profits are spread thinner and more evenly by the program, small validators will find running costs exceed earnings and eventually shut down. That would be the scariest moment of Ethereum's foundation loosening. See, this is not a simple happy technical iteration; it's clearly a redivision of the interest cake, tearing down old labels and reapplying new ones, with everyone secretly wrestling for position. Some will get rich in this reshuffle, but some old giants are destined to be toppled. Honestly, I hold ETH myself and am optimistic, but my nerves are really tight, with take-profit and stop-loss orders set early. In this industry, it's meaningless to see who makes money faster; surviving longer is the real skill. Don't get hyped by a few brainless hype posts only to find yourself rushing in full of faith, just to be the one taking the losses for someone else's gamble. $ETH $BTC $SOL

Macro perspective: The U.S. Senate will hold a review vote on the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" on May 14, with the bill's passage probability rising back to about 60%. The compromise on stablecoins has "significantly boosted market sentiment." Trend perspective: After intense volatility in April, BTC has stabilized above $80,000, with the latest quote around $81,028. The total cryptocurrency market cap has increased by nearly $4 billion from recent lows. ETH completed the Glamsterdam upgrade, raising the Gas limit sharply from 60 million to 200 million, marking the largest expansion in history. Ecosystem perspective: The proportion of Solana developers surged from 6% in 2020 to 23%. Western Digital launched a stablecoin on Solana, Jito reached an institutional staking partnership with Solana Company, and $BURNIE briefly surged over 100% following Elon Musk's Twitter stimulus. Investment logic: Arthur Hayes bluntly stated at the Consensus conference in May that "99% of altcoins will eventually go to zero," recommending focus on Bitcoin and projects with strong communities and applications. Meanwhile, the "AI + Web3" narrative is exploding, with OKX launching the Agentic Wallet trading competition (50,000 USDC prize pool), allowing users to complete full-chain operations from research, execution to tracking via conversational AI. 📊 Market Trends and Macro Environment Bitcoin recently experienced a "rollercoaster" ride, rebounding strongly from a low of $74,937 to a high of $82,850, currently consolidating above $80,000. The Federal Reserve continues to hold interest rates steady in the 3.50%-3.75% range, with dissent votes reaching the highest since 1992. Employment data was unexpectedly strong, pushing the probability of a rate hike to 20.8%. Market expectations for the Fed this year have shifted rapidly from two rate cuts to holding steady or even hiking. Interestingly, Bitcoin is increasingly "unbothered" by macro headwinds (Bitcoin doesn't care). Some analysts attribute this to its established narrative as an inflation hedge, combined with continued net inflows into ETFs supporting the price. 🏛️ Major: U.S. "Clarity Act" Faces Key Vote The U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote on the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" (CLARITY Act) on May 14. Key points include: · Defining jurisdiction boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, clarifying when tokens are securities or commodities · Stablecoin compromise allowing active trading stablecoins to generate yield but prohibiting passive reserves from generating yield · Banks are fiercely lobbying Republicans to oppose, but Coinbase has returned to the support camp. Galaxy Digital's CEO estimates a 70% chance of passage, predicting BTC could hit $100,000 if it breaks $84,000. Polymarket's probability of passage this year has risen to about 65%. For investors, this bill is seen as the "most important catalyst" for the U.S. digital asset market, turning the prerequisite for massive institutional capital inflows from "waiting" into a "countdown." 🚀 Mainstream Public Chain Ecosystem Observations ETH Achieves Historic Scaling On May 1, Ethereum completed the Glamsterdam upgrade, raising the Gas limit from 60 million to 200 million. Rollup fees are expected to drop by about 70%, a huge positive for application-layer DeFi and cross-chain interactions. Solana Ecosystem Heats Up Solana is rising strongly both institutionally and among developers. Western Digital has launched the USDPT stablecoin on Solana for cross-border settlements. The Jito Foundation and Solana Company have formed a strategic partnership to deploy institutional-grade validators and staking products across four Asia-Pacific locations. In developer distribution, Solana's share of blockchain developers has grown from 6% in 2020 to 23%, while Ethereum's share dropped from 82% to 31%. In 2025, Solana attracted 4,100 new developers compared to Ethereum's 3,700. In Q1, Solana's transaction volume was 125 times that of Ethereum. Its monolithic architecture retains talent and capital within a single execution environment, proving to be a more effective model for attracting developers. SOL is currently trading near $89, showing significant pressure year-to-date. The gap between its all-time high and current price is large, but growth on both institutional and developer fronts is evident, with expected volatility remaining high.

ETHUSDTperpetual100xSellOpen position

Trade

Floating PnL

+36.58%

Average sub-order price2,316.10Mark price2,324.58

As of 19:35 on May 9, 2026, ETH is approximately $2318, in a mid-term consolidation and short-term weak pattern, with a key range of $2250–$2420. Only a breakout above the upper boundary will open up rebound space. 1. Current Price and Technicals (May 9) • Current price: $2318 (24h +1.97%), market cap about $280 billion. • Short-term support: $2250 (strong support), $2300 (psychological level). • Short-term resistance: $2380–$2420 (core resistance, not effectively held for 3 months), $2620 (200-day moving average, mid-term strong pressure). • Technical signals: RSI ≈ 49 (neutral), Bollinger Bands middle line at $2325, currently a slight rebound but with insufficient volume, still within the consolidation range. 2. Core Fundamentals (Bull-Bear Battle) ✅ Bullish factors • Institutional funds: Morgan Stanley and others advancing ETH spot trading, continuous inflow of ETF funds, increasing institutional allocation willingness. • Technical upgrade: Glamsterdam hard fork (expected mid-2026), enhancing L1 capacity and reducing fees, beneficial for long-term ecosystem development. • Supply deflation: ongoing staking and burning mechanisms, slowing circulation growth, long-term supply-demand tightness. ⚠️ Bearish factors • On-chain weakness: DEX trading volume down 53% over six months, DApp revenue down 49%, network activity and ETH demand weak. • Competitive diversion: Solana and others capturing market with low fees and high TPS, DApp revenue share reaching 42%, Ethereum ecosystem under pressure. • Security incidents: $630 million lost in crypto sector due to hacker attacks in April, dragging down market confidence. • Macro pressure: Fed high interest rates, ongoing geopolitical conflicts, overall risk assets under pressure, ETH unlikely to remain unaffected. 3. Short-term (1–2 weeks) Trend Judgment • Base scenario: $2250–$2420 consolidation, rebound faces resistance at $2380–$2420 then falls back, high probability of testing $2250 support. • Optimistic scenario: volume breakout above $2420, target near $2600 (200-day moving average). • Pessimistic scenario: break below $2250, test $2100–$2150 range. 4. Mid-to-long-term (3–6 months) Outlook • Key catalysts: Glamsterdam upgrade implementation, Fed rate cut expectations, continuous institutional inflows, potentially driving ETH rebound to $2800–$3200 range. • Risks: ecosystem contraction, intensified competition, worsening macro environment, possibly maintaining low volatility between $2000–$2500. 5. Trading Reference (Not Investment Advice) • Short-term: light long positions at $2250–$2300, stop loss at $2200; short positions at $2380–$2420, stop loss at $2450. • Mid-term: mainly wait and see, add positions after breaking $2420; reduce positions to hedge if breaking below $2250.